Resale Project Scorecard
Blossom Residences
D23 · Bukit Batok, Bukit Panjang, Choa Chu Kang · 99-year leasehold · completed 2014 · 602 units
Grade S, 7.76 out of 10, the 11th highest score among 70 resale condos in District 23.
How to read this grade. RPS is a relative comparison of seven scored factors, not a valuation, return forecast or buy recommendation.
TRIBE's 2026 back-test found the composite separated later resale returns less clearly than Historical Performance alone, so the grade should be used to open the factor details, not to close a buying decision. Read the evidence →
- Lease left, about
- 84 yrs
- Resales, 12 months to Oct 2026
- 16
- To Segar LRT
- 200 m
3D model: block outlines © OpenStreetMap contributors, roof heights from OneMap 3D (SLA)
Blossom Residences Score
- S
- Grade
- Score out of 10
- 7.76
- Highest score among 70 resale condos in District 23
- 11th
Top-tier project across nearly every dimension. Standout strengths: capital appreciation, project size. Key weaknesses: MRT access, future transformation.
Project's Historical Performance25%10/10
Avg Ann. of +4.16% places this condo in the top 6% of its 2014-era cohort — exceptional capital appreciation relative to peers of the same vintage.
The district median is 6/10.
Primary School Effect20%8/10
4 primary schools within 1km (nearest: West Spring Primary School at 0.29km). Strong school proximity — a genuine advantage for young families.
The district median is 7/10.
- West Spring Primary School
- Greenridge Primary School
- Beacon Primary School
- Zhenghua Primary School
Within 1km on OneMap's School Query for at least one block, the measure MOE uses for Primary 1. Check your block's postal code on OneMap School Query →
Project Size16%10/10
602 units — ideal scale for liquidity and facilities without crowding. Typically the sweet spot for resale turnover.
The district median is 8/10.
MRT Proximity13%4/10
200 m from Segar LRT (BP11), 1.4 km from Bukit Panjang MRT (BP6 / DT1) — weaker MRT access, likely requires bus or car for most trips.
The district median is 8/10.
Rental Yield10%6/10
Rental yield of 3.60% — above-average income return.
The district median is 5/10.
Tenure10%8/10
99YR tenure — about 84 years remaining — no near-term decay concern.
The district median is 8.5/10.
Future Transformation6%2/10
Marginal future-catalyst exposure — nearest driver: Choa Chu Kang West MRT (JS1, JRL1) at 3.28km, beyond meaningful proximity bands. Score is low but a forward-looking catalyst was still identified.
The district median is 3.5/10.
Scores updated October 2026. On the map →
Why Blossom Residences scores 7.76
Blossom Residences scores 7.76 out of 10 on the TRIBE Resale Project Scorecard, Grade S, ranking 133rd of 2,350 resale condos scored in Singapore and 11th of 70 in District 23 (Bukit Batok, Bukit Panjang, Choa Chu Kang). Its strongest factors are Project's Historical Performance (10/10) and Project Size (10/10); its weakest is Future Transformation (2/10).
| Factor | This condoBlossom Residences | DistrictDistrict median | EffectEffect on score | Scores above |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project's Historical Performance25% | 10/10 | 6/10 | +1.00 | 94% of district |
| Primary School Effect20% | 8/10 | 7/10 | +0.20 | 59% of district |
| Project Size16% | 10/10 | 8/10 | +0.32 | 74% of district |
| MRT Proximity13% | 4/10 | 8/10 | −0.52 | 1% of district |
| Rental Yield10% | 6/10 | 5/10 | +0.10 | 68% of district |
| Tenure10% | 8/10 | 8.5/10 | −0.05 | 28% of district |
| Future Transformation6% | 2/10 | 3.5/10 | −0.09 | 6% of district |
Medians are across the 70 scored resale projects in District 23 (Bukit Batok, Bukit Panjang, Choa Chu Kang). “Effect on score” is the factor's weighted difference from that median, so the column sums (to within rounding) to the gap between Blossom Residences and a median-profile project (6.78). “Scores above” is the share of those projects this one out-scores on the factor. Weights and bands are on the methodology page.
Blossom Residences Prices
By unit type at Blossom Residences
| Unit type | Size | Sold for | Median PSF | Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-bedroom915 sq ft | 915 sq ft | $1.16M | $1,283 psf | 2 |
| 3-bedroom1,055 sq ft | 1,055 sq ft | $1.21M to $1.68M | $1,280 psf | 11 |
| 4-bedroom1,249 sq ft | 1,249 sq ft | $1.72M | $1,378 psf | 2 |
Past transactions at Blossom Residences
16 resales, Nov 2025 to Oct 2026 · median $1,281 psf · $1,030,000 to $1,720,000 · 15 of the 15 with a purchase on record sold at a profit
| Sale | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Sep 2026 | 34 Segar Road | 11 | #11-35353BR · Blk 34 | 3BR | 1,055 | $1,314 | $1,386,000 | Resale |
| 15 Jul 2026 | 30 Segar Road | 4 | #04-04043BR · Blk 30 | 3BR | 1,055 | $1,232 | $1,300,000 | Resale |
| 6 Jul 2026 | 34 Segar Road | 13 | #13-29293BR · Blk 34 | 3BR | 1,055 | $1,261 | $1,330,000 | Resale |
| 15 Jun 2026 | 30 Segar Road | 1 | #01-12123BR · Blk 30 | 3BR | 1,335 | $1,259 | $1,680,000 | Resale |
| 5 Jun 2026 | 30 Segar Road | 1 | #01-01012BR · Blk 30 | 2BR | 1,076 | $1,198 | $1,290,000 | Resale |
| 3 Jun 2026 | 30 Segar Road | 8 | #08-11113BR · Blk 30 | 3BR | 969 | $1,281 | $1,240,888 | Resale |
| 29 May 2026 | 34 Segar Road | 7 | #07-32323BR · Blk 34 | 3BR | 1,055 | $1,317 | $1,388,888 | Resale |
| 12 May 2026 | 34 Segar Road | 14 | #14-30304BR · Blk 34 | 4BR | 1,249 | $1,378 | $1,720,000 | Resale |
| 6 May 2026 | 34 Segar Road | 10 | #10-31314BR · Blk 34 | 4BR | 1,249 | $1,378 | $1,720,000 | Resale |
| 11 Mar 2026 | 32 Segar Road | 6 | #06-23233BR · Blk 32 | 3BR | 1,055 | $1,280 | $1,350,000 | Resale |
Show as a table
| Period | Sales | Median PSF | D23 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2025 | 2 | $1,308 psf | $1,517 psf |
| Dec 2025 | 1 | — | $1,542 psf |
| Jan 2026 | 1 | — | $1,437 psf |
| Feb 2026 | 1 | — | $1,466 psf |
| Mar 2026 | 2 | $1,293 psf | $1,501 psf |
| Apr 2026 | — | — | $1,482 psf |
| May 2026 | 3 | $1,378 psf | $1,523 psf |
| Jun 2026 | 3 | $1,259 psf | $1,514 psf |
| Jul 2026 | 2 | $1,247 psf | $1,506 psf |
| Aug 2026 | — | — | $1,444 psf |
| Sep 2026 | 1 | — | $1,506 psf |
| Oct 2026 | — | — | — |
A month is plotted from two sales up; the district line from ten.
Sellers here made a median +4.8% a year, ranked 11 of 50 in D23 and 113 of 715 condos. See the most profitable condos in D23 →
URA REALIS resale and sub-sale caveats, Nov 2021 to Oct 2026. Check one unit →
Blossom Residences Rent
- Median rent a month
- $4,000
- Gross yield
- 3.7%
- Rental contracts
- 11
| Unit type | Median rent | Most rents | Gross yield | LetsContracts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-bedroom | $4,000 | $3,950 to $4,380 | 3.7% | 11 |
Rental contracts at Blossom Residences
15 contracts, Sep 2025 to Aug 2026 · median $4,000 a month · $3,000 to $5,400
| Month | Type | Size | Rent a month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | 2BR | 700 to 800 sq ft | $3,400 |
| Jun 2026 | 3BR | 1,000 to 1,100 sq ft | $4,000 |
| Jun 2026 | 4BR | 1,400 to 1,500 sq ft | $4,900 |
| May 2026 | 3BR | 1,000 to 1,100 sq ft | $3,900 |
| Apr 2026 | 3BR | 900 to 1,000 sq ft | $3,600 |
| Apr 2026 | 3BR | 1,000 to 1,100 sq ft | $4,100 |
| Mar 2026 | 2BR | 700 to 800 sq ft | $3,000 |
| Mar 2026 | 3BR | 1,000 to 1,100 sq ft | $4,000 |
| Mar 2026 | 3BR | 1,300 to 1,400 sq ft | $4,650 |
| Jan 2026 | 3BR | 1,400 to 1,500 sq ft | $5,400 |
URA rental contracts. The table above is the 12 months to August 2026. Yield is gross. URA publishes no unit number for a letting.
Blossom Residences By stack
- Highest, stack 30
- $1,295 psf
- Lowest, stack 36
- $1,090 psf
- Stacks with 2+ resales
- 33
| Stack | Median PSF | Size | Sold on | Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | $1,274 psf | 754 sq ft | Levels 1 to 7 | 3 |
| 02 | $1,276 psf | 754 sq ft | Levels 2 to 14 | 4 |
| 03 | $1,135 psf | 969 sq ft | Levels 2 to 8 | 3 |
| 04 | $1,230 psf | 1,055 sq ft | Levels 4 to 11 | 3 |
| 05 | $1,229 psf | 1,496 sq ft | Levels 4 to 17 | 5 |
| 06 | $1,262 psf | 969 sq ft | Levels 11 to 16 | 4 |
| 07 | $1,156 psf | 969 sq ft | Levels 9 to 18 | 5 |
| 08 | $1,220 psf | 1,292 sq ft | Levels 10 to 11 | 2 |
Show the other 25 stacks
| Stack | Median PSF | Size | Sold on | Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09 | $1,197 psf | 969 sq ft | Levels 2 to 18 | 5 |
| 10 | $1,239 psf | 969 sq ft | Levels 2 to 14 | 7 |
| 11 | $1,244 psf | 969 sq ft | Levels 2 to 18 | 6 |
| 12 | $1,275 psf | 1,152 sq ft | Levels 1 to 18 | 4 |
| 13 | $1,272 psf | 1,356 sq ft | Levels 6 to 18 | 3 |
| 14 | $1,203 psf | 1,055 sq ft | Levels 2 to 14 | 9 |
| 15 | $1,223 psf | 1,055 sq ft | Levels 4 to 16 | 4 |
| 16 | $1,294 psf | 1,249 sq ft | Levels 6 to 17 | 5 |
| 17 | $1,095 psf | 1,087 sq ft | Levels 4 to 8 | 3 |
| 18 | $1,213 psf | 1,055 sq ft | Levels 8 to 18 | 5 |
| 19 | $1,199 psf | 1,055 sq ft | Levels 4 to 18 | 6 |
| 22 | $1,213 psf | 1,055 sq ft | Levels 12 to 14 | 3 |
| 23 | $1,202 psf | 1,055 sq ft | Levels 1 to 10 | 5 |
| 24 | $1,213 psf | 1,055 sq ft | Levels 3 to 16 | 7 |
| 25 | $1,212 psf | 1,055 sq ft | Levels 7 to 14 | 3 |
| 26 | $1,255 psf | 1,200 sq ft | Levels 1 to 18 | 4 |
| 27 | $1,249 psf | 1,109 sq ft | Levels 6 to 13 | 4 |
| 28 | $1,119 psf | 1,238 sq ft | Levels 6 to 18 | 4 |
| 29 | $1,228 psf | 1,055 sq ft | Levels 8 to 13 | 2 |
| 30 | $1,295 psf | 1,249 sq ft | Levels 2 to 18 | 4 |
| 31 | $1,253 psf | 1,249 sq ft | Levels 2 to 10 | 3 |
| 32 | $1,275 psf | 1,055 sq ft | Levels 7 to 14 | 3 |
| 33 | $1,223 psf | 1,055 sq ft | Levels 9 to 14 | 2 |
| 35 | $1,251 psf | 1,055 sq ft | Levels 6 to 17 | 5 |
| 36 | $1,090 psf | 1,055 sq ft | Levels 6 to 18 | 6 |
URA REALIS resale caveats, 2022 to Oct 2026. Sun path by facing →
Blossom Residences Notes
How these numbers are worked out
- Grade S places Blossom Residences in a relative band under the current seven-factor formula. RPS is a relative comparison of seven scored factors, not a valuation, return forecast or buy recommendation. TRIBE's 2026 back-test found the composite separated later resale returns less clearly than Historical Performance alone, so the grade should be used to open the factor details, not to close a buying decision. Two units can still be very different buys: the asking price, stack, floor, facing and condition decide the outcome.
- PSF against the district: $1,281 psf at Blossom Residences against $1,495 psf across District 23, medians over 12 months.
- MRT distance is a straight line on the map; the walking route is longer.
- Prices: aggregates of URA REALIS resale caveats, data to October 2026 (Nov 2025 – Oct 2026; the year before is Nov 2024 – Oct 2025, median $1,261 psf). A specific unit's value depends on floor, size, facing and condition.
- By unit type: a price range is shown from three sales up; with two, the figure is the median. Unit types with one sale, and sales with no bedroom count on record, are left out.
- Past transactions: every resale and sub-sale caveat lodged with URA from Nov 2021 to Oct 2026, newest first; a unit is its storey and stack (#07-18). Typing a unit or a stack lists its sales across the whole span. Profit is the sale price less the seller's own purchase price as the caveats pair them, before stamp duties, fees and loan interest; the gain a year is compounded and shown from one year held. The trend line is the median from two sales up per month, quarter or half-year, the district line from ten. 10Y appears once the dataset runs that far back.
- Rent: aggregates of URA rental contracts, Sep 2025 – Aug 2026, for unit types with three contracts or more; the contract list under the table carries every letting on file, including those with no bedroom count, and URA publishes no unit number for a letting. "Most rents" is the middle half of contracts, shown from five up. Gross yield is a year of the median rent over the median resale price of the same unit type (12 months to October 2026, two sales or more), before maintenance fees, property tax, agent fees, vacancy and mortgage interest.
- By stack: resales from 2022 to Oct 2026, medians per stack. A stack is the last two digits of the unit number, so #05-37 and #08-37 are both stack 37. Stacks with one sale (3 here) are left out, and prices moved over the period, so read a gap between two stacks as a lead to check, not a rule.
- Factor bars: the black mark on each bar is the district median.
- Score: seven weighted factors. Methodology published.
What the score cannot tell you
- RPS scores the project, not a unit. Floor, stack, facing, renovation and the asking price are outside the score. In the 12 months to October 2026, the 16 resale caveats at Blossom Residences ranged from $1,198 psf to $1,378 psf: that spread is unit-level variation the score cannot see.
- Historical Performance is a percentile among projects of similar vintage (completed around 2014, within a year or so, widened when the cohort is small). A high score is strong for its age group, not against the whole market.
- The nearest rail stop is Segar LRT (BP11) (200 m), an LRT, which the MRT Proximity factor does not count; the score reflects the nearest MRT station instead. Distances are straight-line and bus links are not scored.
- Primary School Effect counts the 4 primary schools within 1 km on OneMap's School Query (the school's land boundary to the block's building outline, the measure MOE uses for P1), weighted by recent P1 ballot demand. A school counts when any block is within 1 km, so confirm your own block's postal code before relying on it.
- Scores updated October 2026; transactions to October 2026. Nothing on this page is a valuation or advice on a specific unit.
- Facing decides a unit's morning or afternoon sun, and it varies stack by stack. See the sun path at Blossom Residences for any facing, date and time → The hours count direction only; the 3D map draws the shadows of the blocks around it.