Skip to content
2,350 resale condos, independently scored· TRIBELess Than Half of an Entry Premium Comes Back. It Costs 0.69 Points a Year.· InsightsNew Project Scorecard — see how new launches grade· TRIBEWaiting Out a Launch Changes the Unit More Than It Changes the Price· InsightsNew Launches — balance units and pricing, one place· TRIBEA Launch Sold Before Completion Earns Half a Point a Year More· InsightsPurchase Planner — know what you can afford· TRIBEThe School Catchment Is in the Price. It Is Not in the Tenants.· Insights
TRIBE
3D model of Platina Gardens
DGrade

Resale Project Scorecard

Platina Gardens

D27 · Sembawang, Yishun · freehold · completed 1987 · 28 units

Grade D, 4.15 out of 10, the 36th highest score among 37 resale condos in District 27.

How to read this grade. RPS is a relative comparison of seven scored factors, not a valuation, return forecast or buy recommendation.

TRIBE's 2026 back-test found the composite separated later resale returns less clearly than Historical Performance alone, so the grade should be used to open the factor details, not to close a buying decision. Read the evidence →

Tenure
Freehold
To Yishun MRT
1.0 km

3D model: block outlines © OpenStreetMap contributors, roof heights from OneMap 3D (SLA)

Platina Gardens Score

D
Grade
Score out of 10
4.15
Highest score among 37 resale condos in District 27
36th

Weak project — significant gaps in multiple factors. Standout strengths: tenure. Key weaknesses: schools, future transformation.

Project's Historical Performance25%5/10

Avg Ann. of +0.00% — but from only 1 resale sale in the last 10 years, too thin a sample to read capital appreciation reliably, so the score is discounted toward the cohort average.

The district median is 6/10.

Primary School Effect20%1/10

School proximity could not be measured — address geocoding incomplete for this development.

The district median is 9/10.

Within 1km on OneMap's School Query for at least one block, the measure MOE uses for Primary 1. Check your block's postal code on OneMap School Query →

Project Size16%3/10

28 units — very small project; niche product with thin resale market.

The district median is 8/10.

MRT Proximity13%4/10

1.04km from Yishun MRT (NS13) — weaker MRT access, likely requires bus or car for most trips.

The district median is 7/10.

Rental Yield10%7/10

Rental yield of 3.90% — strong income return.

The district median is 7/10.

Tenure10%10/10

Freehold tenure — no lease decay concerns, preserves long-term value.

The district median is 8/10.

Future Transformation6%0/10

No URA Masterplan transformation zone or upcoming MRT station within 3.5km of this project — minimal forward-looking infrastructure tailwind.

The district median is 1/10.

Scores updated October 2026. On the map →

Why Platina Gardens scores 4.15

Platina Gardens scores 4.15 out of 10 on the TRIBE Resale Project Scorecard, Grade D, ranking 2269th of 2,350 resale condos scored in Singapore and 36th of 37 in District 27 (Sembawang, Yishun). Its strongest factors are Tenure (10/10) and Rental Yield (7/10); its weakest is Future Transformation (0/10).

FactorThis condoDistrictEffect
Project's Historical Performance25%5/106/10−0.25
Primary School Effect20%1/109/10−1.60
Project Size16%3/108/10−0.80
MRT Proximity13%4/107/10−0.39
Rental Yield10%7/107/10±0.00
Tenure10%10/108/10+0.20
Future Transformation6%0/101/10−0.06

Medians are across the 37 scored resale projects in District 27 (Sembawang, Yishun). “Effect on score” is the factor's weighted difference from that median, so the column sums (to within rounding) to the gap between Platina Gardens and a median-profile project (7.05). “Scores above” is the share of those projects this one out-scores on the factor. Weights and bands are on the methodology page.

Platina Gardens Notes

How these numbers are worked out
  • Grade D places Platina Gardens in a relative band under the current seven-factor formula. RPS is a relative comparison of seven scored factors, not a valuation, return forecast or buy recommendation. TRIBE's 2026 back-test found the composite separated later resale returns less clearly than Historical Performance alone, so the grade should be used to open the factor details, not to close a buying decision. Two units can still be very different buys: the asking price, stack, floor, facing and condition decide the outcome.
  • MRT distance is a straight line on the map; the walking route is longer.
  • Factor bars: the black mark on each bar is the district median.
  • Score: seven weighted factors. Methodology published.
What the score cannot tell you
  • RPS scores the project, not a unit. Floor, stack, facing, renovation and the asking price are outside the score.
  • Platina Gardens has no row in the URA REALIS caveat dataset TRIBE uses, so no recent-price evidence is shown here. The Historical Performance factor (5/10) rests on the 10-year record.
  • Historical Performance is a percentile among projects of similar vintage (completed around 1987, within a year or so, widened when the cohort is small). A high score is strong for its age group, not against the whole market.
  • The nearest MRT is Yishun MRT (NS13), 1.0 km in a straight line. The walking route is usually longer, and bus links are not scored.
  • OneMap's School Query lists no primary school within 1 km of any block, so none counts toward the Primary School Effect; a school just outside the 1 km line would not appear.
  • Scores updated October 2026. Nothing on this page is a valuation or advice on a specific unit.

Next step