RPS · Resale Project Scorecard
Cyan — Grade B
RPS score 6.42/10 · D10 · Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin · 278 units · scored across 7 weighted factors — methodology published.
FH · KENTISH COURT PTE LTD · TOP 2014
Solid, middle-of-the-pack project. Standout strengths: tenure, MRT access. Key weaknesses: future transformation, total returns.
Factor breakdown
- Project's Historical Performance25% weight
- 5/10
- Primary School Effect20% weight
- 7/10
- Project Size16% weight
- 8/10
- MRT Proximity13% weight
- 8/10
- Rental Yield10% weight
- 2/10
- Tenure10% weight
- 10/10
- Future Transformation6% weight
- 4/10
Avg Ann. of +1.09% — near-median performance within its 2014-era cohort (45th percentile).
2 primary schools within 1km (nearest: SINGAPORE CHINESE GIRLS' PRIMARY SCHOOL at 0.36km). Strong school proximity — a genuine advantage for young families.
278 units — good project size supporting active resale market and adequate facilities.
0.52km from Stevens Mrt Stn (DT10) — short walk to MRT, good transport convenience.
Rental yield of 2.44% — weak income return.
Freehold tenure — no lease decay concerns, preserves long-term value.
Limited future-catalyst exposure — nearest is Newton–Orchard mixed-use precinct at 1.02km, far enough that the impact on this project is modest.
Primary schools within 1km: Singapore Chinese Girls' Primary School, Anglo-Chinese School (Primary).
The verdict· Scores updated September 2026
Cyan scores 6.42 out of 10 on the TRIBE Resale Project Scorecard, Grade B, ranking 713th of 2,357 resale condos scored in Singapore and 14th of 308 in District 10 (Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin). Its strongest factors are Tenure (10/10) and Project Size (8/10); its weakest is Rental Yield (2/10). Solid, middle-of-the-pack project. Standout strengths: tenure, MRT access. Key weaknesses: future transformation, total returns.
See all 308 scored condos in District 10 (Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin) →
RPS · Resale Project Scorecard
Recent resale transactions at Cyan
12 months to September 2026 (Oct 2025 – Sep 2026): 9 resale transactions, median $2,727 psf, median price $2.73M. Median PSF is up 2.9% on the previous 12 months (Oct 2024 – Sep 2025, $2,650 psf).
| Period | Transactions | Median PSF | Median price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct–Dec 2025 | 1 | $2,725 psf | $2.73M |
| Jan–Mar 2026 | 4 | $2,707 psf | $2.85M |
| Apr–Jun 2026 | 2 | $2,419 psf | $2.03M |
| Jul–Sep 2026 | 2 | $2,761 psf | $3.42M |
| 12-month total | 9 | $2,727 psf | $2.73M |
Aggregates of URA REALIS resale caveats (data to September 2026). A specific unit's value depends on floor, size, facing and condition — for a unit-level read, use the Resale Price Check.
Cyan: frequently asked questions
Answers generated from the scorecard data — RPS rank 713th of 2,357, scores updated September 2026.
- Is Cyan a good buy in 2026?
- Cyan scores 6.42/10 on the TRIBE Resale Project Scorecard (Grade B), which places it 713th of 2,357 Singapore resale condos and 14th of 308 in District 10 (Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin). Solid, middle-of-the-pack project. Standout strengths: tenure, MRT access. Key weaknesses: future transformation, total returns. RPS scores project-level demand fundamentals — not a specific unit or its asking price — so read the grade as a screen: it tells you whether the drivers of resale demand are present, and the price you pay still decides the outcome.
- What is the average PSF at Cyan?
- In the 12 months to September 2026 (Oct 2025 – Sep 2026), URA REALIS records 9 resale transactions at Cyan, at a median of $2,727 psf and a median price of $2.73M (range $2,102 psf to $2,848 psf). The median PSF is up 2.9% on the previous 12 months (Oct 2024 – Sep 2025, $2,650 psf). Figures are aggregates of caveats lodged with URA; a specific unit's value depends on floor, size, facing and condition.
- How far is Cyan from the nearest MRT station?
- Cyan is about 520m from Stevens MRT (DT10), scoring 8/10 on the MRT Proximity factor (13% of the RPS score). Distances are straight-line, and confirmed upcoming stations are also considered.
- How does Cyan compare with Valley Park?
- Valley Park is the project scored next to Cyan on the District 10 ranking: 6.47 (Grade A) against Cyan's 6.42 (Grade B). Cyan scores higher on Project's Historical Performance (5 vs 4) and MRT Proximity (8 vs 7); Valley Park scores higher on Project Size (8 vs 10) and Primary School Effect (7 vs 8).
- Which primary schools are within 1km of Cyan?
- 2 primary schools are within 1km of Cyan: Singapore Chinese Girls' Primary School, Anglo-Chinese School (Primary). 2 primary schools within 1km (nearest: SINGAPORE CHINESE GIRLS' PRIMARY SCHOOL at 0.36km). Strong school proximity — a genuine advantage for young families. Cyan scores 7/10 on the Primary School Effect factor (20% of the RPS score), which weights each school by its recent P1 ballot demand.
- What is the tenure of Cyan, and how big is the project?
- Cyan is freehold, completed in 2014, has 278 units, developed by KENTISH COURT PTE LTD. Freehold tenure — no lease decay concerns, preserves long-term value. 278 units — good project size supporting active resale market and adequate facilities. Tenure carries 10% of the RPS score and Project Size 16%.
Scored either side of Cyan in Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin
The projects immediately above and below it on the Resale Project Scorecard — the comparison a buyer is usually actually making.
- Valley ParkA6.47
- MontviewB6.42
- One JervoisA6.53
- Jaya TowerB6.40
- Jervois TreasuresA6.60
- Gallop GablesB6.39
See all 308 scored projects in Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin →
Free condo report
Email me this condo's report
Get the full report on Cyan — PSF trends, rival comparison, and our verdict — in your inbox.