Resale Project Scorecard
Altez
D02 · Chinatown, Tanjong Pagar · 99-year leasehold · completed 2014 · 280 units
Grade B, 5.47 out of 10, the 11th highest score among 19 resale condos in District 2.
How to read this grade. RPS is a relative comparison of seven scored factors, not a valuation, return forecast or buy recommendation.
TRIBE's 2026 back-test found the composite separated later resale returns less clearly than Historical Performance alone, so the grade should be used to open the factor details, not to close a buying decision. Read the evidence →
- Lease left, about
- 81 yrs
- Resales, 12 months to Oct 2026
- 12
- To Tanjong Pagar MRT
- 210 m
Artist's impression: Bishan Properties Pte Ltd
Altez Score
- B
- Grade
- Score out of 10
- 5.47
- Highest score among 19 resale condos in District 2
- 11th
Solid, middle-of-the-pack project. Standout strengths: MRT access, project size. Key weaknesses: schools, capital appreciation.
Project's Historical Performance25%2/10
Avg Ann. of -0.31% — bottom 12% within its 2014-era cohort. Weak capital appreciation, even when judged against vintage peers.
The district median is 3/10.
Primary School Effect20%3/10
1 primary school within 1km (Cantonment Primary School, 0.40km away), and it is undersubscribed. Limited school draw for families prioritising Primary 1 registration.
The district median is 3/10.
- Cantonment Primary School
Within 1km on OneMap's School Query for at least one block, the measure MOE uses for Primary 1. Check your block's postal code on OneMap School Query →
Project Size16%8/10
280 units — good project size supporting active resale market and adequate facilities.
The district median is 8/10.
MRT Proximity13%9/10
210 m from Tanjong Pagar MRT (EW15) — direct, walk-in MRT access. Strong commuter appeal.
The district median is 10/10.
Rental Yield10%7/10
Rental yield of 3.89% — strong income return.
The district median is 6/10.
Tenure10%8/10
99YR tenure — about 81 years remaining — no near-term decay concern.
The district median is 8/10.
Future Transformation6%7/10
Strong future-catalyst exposure — closest driver: Cantonment MRT (CC33, CCL6) at 0.26km. Well positioned for the URA DMP2025 / LTA upcoming-MRT pipeline; expect tangible neighbourhood-level upside.
The district median is 7/10.
Scores updated October 2026. On the map →
Why Altez scores 5.47
Altez scores 5.47 out of 10 on the TRIBE Resale Project Scorecard, Grade B, ranking 1646th of 2,350 resale condos scored in Singapore and 11th of 19 in District 2 (Chinatown, Tanjong Pagar). Its strongest factors are MRT Proximity (9/10) and Project Size (8/10); its weakest is Project's Historical Performance (2/10).
| Factor | This condoAltez | DistrictDistrict median | EffectEffect on score | Scores above |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project's Historical Performance25% | 2/10 | 3/10 | −0.25 | 11% of district |
| Primary School Effect20% | 3/10 | 3/10 | ±0.00 | 0% of district |
| Project Size16% | 8/10 | 8/10 | ±0.00 | 50% of district |
| MRT Proximity13% | 9/10 | 10/10 | −0.13 | 0% of district |
| Rental Yield10% | 7/10 | 6/10 | +0.10 | 56% of district |
| Tenure10% | 8/10 | 8/10 | ±0.00 | 33% of district |
| Future Transformation6% | 7/10 | 7/10 | ±0.00 | 6% of district |
Medians are across the 19 scored resale projects in District 2 (Chinatown, Tanjong Pagar). “Effect on score” is the factor's weighted difference from that median, so the column sums (to within rounding) to the gap between Altez and a median-profile project (5.75). “Scores above” is the share of those projects this one out-scores on the factor. Weights and bands are on the methodology page.
Altez Prices
By unit type at Altez
| Unit type | Size | Sold for | Median PSF | Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-bedroom840 sq ft | 840 sq ft | $1.18M to $1.50M | $1,763 psf | 3 |
| 2-bedroom1,109 sq ft | 1,109 sq ft | $1.88M to $2.74M | $2,286 psf | 6 |
| 3-bedroom1,561 sq ft | 1,561 sq ft | $3.47M to $3.80M | $2,295 psf | 3 |
Past transactions at Altez
12 resales, Nov 2025 to Oct 2026 · median $2,264 psf · $1,180,000 to $3,798,723 · 2 of the 4 with a purchase on record sold at a profit
| Sale | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Sep 2026 | 16 Enggor Street | 48 | #48-02022BR | 2BR | 1,173 | $2,332 | $2,736,000 | Resale |
| 30 Jul 2026 | 16 Enggor Street | 50 | #50-01012BR | 2BR | 1,109 | $2,316 | $2,567,493 | Resale |
| 29 Jul 2026 | 16 Enggor Street | 36 | #36-06061BR | 1BR | 840 | $1,763 | $1,480,000 | Resale |
| 13 Jul 2026 | 16 Enggor Street | 48 | #48-01012BR | 2BR | 1,109 | $2,304 | $2,553,910 | Resale |
| 11 Jun 2026 | 16 Enggor Street | 55 | #55-03033BR | 3BR | 1,561 | $2,295 | $3,582,501 | Resale |
| 14 May 2026 | 16 Enggor Street | 46 | #46-06062BR | 2BR | 1,109 | $2,259 | $2,504,754 | Resale |
| 13 May 2026 | 16 Enggor Street | 44 | #44-01012BR | 2BR | 1,109 | $2,165 | $2,400,000 | Resale |
| 12 May 2026 | 16 Enggor Street | 58 | #58-09093BR | 3BR | 1,561 | $2,434 | $3,798,723 | Resale |
| 29 Apr 2026 | 16 Enggor Street | 20 | #20-03032BR | 2BR | 829 | $2,268 | $1,880,000 | Resale |
| 29 Apr 2026 | 16 Enggor Street | 18 | #18-04041BR | 1BR | 549 | $2,150 | $1,180,000 | Resale |
Show as a table
| Period | Sales | Median PSF | D2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2025 | — | — | $2,213 psf |
| Dec 2025 | — | — | $2,240 psf |
| Jan 2026 | — | — | — |
| Feb 2026 | — | — | — |
| Mar 2026 | 1 | — | $2,099 psf |
| Apr 2026 | 3 | $2,223 psf | $2,076 psf |
| May 2026 | 3 | $2,259 psf | $2,120 psf |
| Jun 2026 | 1 | — | — |
| Jul 2026 | 3 | $2,304 psf | $2,078 psf |
| Aug 2026 | — | — | $1,928 psf |
| Sep 2026 | 1 | — | $1,938 psf |
| Oct 2026 | — | — | — |
A month is plotted from two sales up; the district line from ten.
Sellers here made a median −0.4% a year, ranked 11 of 12 in D02 and 700 of 715 condos. See the most profitable condos in D02 →
URA REALIS resale and sub-sale caveats, Nov 2021 to Oct 2026. Check one unit →
Altez Rent
- Median rent a month
- $5,000 to $10,050
- Gross yield
- 3.4% to 4.1%
- Rental contracts
- 170
| Unit type | Median rent | Most rents | Gross yield | LetsContracts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-bedroom | $5,000 | $4,600 to $5,500 | 4.1% | 110 |
| 2-bedroom | $7,330 | $6,690 to $7,800 | 3.5% | 50 |
| 3-bedroom | $10,050 | $9,930 to $10,100 | 3.4% | 10 |
Rental contracts at Altez
170 contracts, Sep 2025 to Aug 2026 · median $5,500 a month · $3,900 to $11,200
| Month | Type | Size | Rent a month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2026 | 1BR | 500 to 600 sq ft | $3,900 |
| Aug 2026 | 1BR | 500 to 600 sq ft | $4,400 |
| Aug 2026 | 1BR | 500 to 600 sq ft | $4,500 |
| Aug 2026 | 1BR | 600 to 700 sq ft | $4,600 |
| Aug 2026 | 1BR | 500 to 600 sq ft | $4,600 |
| Aug 2026 | 1BR | 600 to 700 sq ft | $4,700 |
| Aug 2026 | 1BR | 800 to 900 sq ft | $5,400 |
| Aug 2026 | 1BR | 800 to 900 sq ft | $5,898 |
| Aug 2026 | 2BR | 800 to 900 sq ft | $6,100 |
| Aug 2026 | 2BR | 900 to 1,000 sq ft | $6,600 |
URA rental contracts. The table above is the 12 months to August 2026. Yield is gross. URA publishes no unit number for a letting.
Altez By stack
- Highest, stack 03
- $2,189 psf
- Lowest, stack 08
- $1,858 psf
- Stacks with 2+ resales
- 8
| Stack | Median PSF | Size | Sold on | Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | $2,165 psf | 1,109 sq ft | Levels 10 to 50 | 5 |
| 02 | $2,037 psf | 1,017 sq ft | Levels 32 to 48 | 2 |
| 03 | $2,189 psf | 764 sq ft | Levels 10 to 55 | 8 |
| 04 | $2,128 psf | 549 sq ft | Levels 10 to 18 | 3 |
| 06 | $2,064 psf | 840 sq ft | Levels 14 to 46 | 3 |
| 08 | $1,858 psf | 926 sq ft | Levels 23 to 46 | 6 |
| 09 | $2,094 psf | 1,367 sq ft | Levels 38 to 58 | 4 |
| 11 | $1,872 psf | 936 sq ft | Levels 21 to 42 | 4 |
URA REALIS resale caveats, 2022 to Oct 2026. Sun path by facing →
Altez Notes
How these numbers are worked out
- Grade B places Altez in a relative band under the current seven-factor formula. RPS is a relative comparison of seven scored factors, not a valuation, return forecast or buy recommendation. TRIBE's 2026 back-test found the composite separated later resale returns less clearly than Historical Performance alone, so the grade should be used to open the factor details, not to close a buying decision. Two units can still be very different buys: the asking price, stack, floor, facing and condition decide the outcome.
- PSF against the district: $2,264 psf at Altez against $2,134 psf across District 2, medians over 12 months.
- MRT distance is a straight line on the map; the walking route is longer.
- Prices: aggregates of URA REALIS resale caveats, data to October 2026 (Nov 2025 – Oct 2026). A specific unit's value depends on floor, size, facing and condition.
- By unit type: a price range is shown from three sales up; with two, the figure is the median.
- Past transactions: every resale and sub-sale caveat lodged with URA from Nov 2021 to Oct 2026, newest first; a unit is its storey and stack (#07-18). Typing a unit or a stack lists its sales across the whole span. Profit is the sale price less the seller's own purchase price as the caveats pair them, before stamp duties, fees and loan interest; the gain a year is compounded and shown from one year held. The trend line is the median from two sales up per month, quarter or half-year, the district line from ten. 10Y appears once the dataset runs that far back.
- Rent: aggregates of URA rental contracts, Sep 2025 – Aug 2026, for unit types with three contracts or more; the contract list under the table carries every letting on file, including those with no bedroom count, and URA publishes no unit number for a letting. "Most rents" is the middle half of contracts, shown from five up. Gross yield is a year of the median rent over the median resale price of the same unit type (12 months to October 2026, two sales or more), before maintenance fees, property tax, agent fees, vacancy and mortgage interest.
- By stack: resales from 2022 to Oct 2026, medians per stack. A stack is the last two digits of the unit number, so #05-37 and #08-37 are both stack 37. Stacks with one sale (1 here) are left out, and prices moved over the period, so read a gap between two stacks as a lead to check, not a rule.
- Factor bars: the black mark on each bar is the district median.
- Score: seven weighted factors. Methodology published.
What the score cannot tell you
- RPS scores the project, not a unit. Floor, stack, facing, renovation and the asking price are outside the score. In the 12 months to October 2026, the 12 resale caveats at Altez ranged from $1,742 psf to $2,434 psf: that spread is unit-level variation the score cannot see.
- Historical Performance is a percentile among projects of similar vintage (completed around 2014, within a year or so, widened when the cohort is small). A high score is strong for its age group, not against the whole market.
- The nearest MRT is Tanjong Pagar MRT (EW15), 210 m in a straight line. The walking route is usually longer, and bus links are not scored.
- Primary School Effect counts the one primary school within 1 km on OneMap's School Query (the school's land boundary to the block's building outline, the measure MOE uses for P1), weighted by recent P1 ballot demand. A school counts when any block is within 1 km, so confirm your own block's postal code before relying on it.
- Scores updated October 2026; transactions to October 2026. Nothing on this page is a valuation or advice on a specific unit.
- Facing decides a unit's morning or afternoon sun, and it varies stack by stack. See the sun path at Altez for any facing, date and time → The hours count direction only; the 3D map draws the shadows of the blocks around it.