Resale Project Scorecard
Nassim Woods
D10 · Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin · 99-year leasehold · completed 1998 · 35 units
Grade D, 3.43 out of 10, the 307th highest score among 307 resale condos in District 10.
How to read this grade. RPS is a relative comparison of seven scored factors, not a valuation, return forecast or buy recommendation.
TRIBE's 2026 back-test found the composite separated later resale returns less clearly than Historical Performance alone, so the grade should be used to open the factor details, not to close a buying decision. Read the evidence →
- Lease left, about
- 92 yrs
- To Napier MRT
- 260 m
Background: Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin, not this condo. Photo credits
Nassim Woods Score
- D
- Grade
- Score out of 10
- 3.43
- Highest score among 307 resale condos in District 10
- 307th
Weak project — significant gaps in multiple factors. Standout strengths: MRT access, tenure. Key weaknesses: schools, rental yield.
Project's Historical Performance25%2/10
Avg Ann. of +0.00% — bottom 13% within its 1998-era cohort. Weak capital appreciation, even when judged against vintage peers.
The district median is 4/10.
Primary School Effect20%1/10
School proximity could not be measured — address geocoding incomplete for this development.
The district median is 7/10.
Within 1km on OneMap's School Query for at least one block, the measure MOE uses for Primary 1. Check your block's postal code on OneMap School Query →
Project Size16%3/10
35 units — very small project; niche product with thin resale market.
The district median is 3/10.
MRT Proximity13%9/10
260m from Napier MRT (TE12) — direct, walk-in MRT access. Strong commuter appeal.
The district median is 8/10.
Rental Yield10%0/10
Rental yield of 1.43% — weak income return.
The district median is 2/10.
Tenure10%9/10
99YR tenure — about 92 years remaining — no near-term decay concern.
The district median is 10/10.
Future Transformation6%3/10
No usable coordinates for this project — Future Transformation defaulted to a neutral 3/10 pending geocode fix.
The district median is 3/10.
Scores updated October 2026.
Why Nassim Woods scores 3.43
Nassim Woods scores 3.43 out of 10 on the TRIBE Resale Project Scorecard, Grade D, ranking 2338th of 2,350 resale condos scored in Singapore and 307th of 307 in District 10 (Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin). Its strongest factors are MRT Proximity (9/10) and Tenure (9/10); its weakest is Rental Yield (0/10).
| Factor | This condoNassim Woods | DistrictDistrict median | EffectEffect on score | Scores above |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project's Historical Performance25% | 2/10 | 4/10 | −0.50 | 4% of district |
| Primary School Effect20% | 1/10 | 7/10 | −1.20 | 0% of district |
| Project Size16% | 3/10 | 3/10 | ±0.00 | 0% of district |
| MRT Proximity13% | 9/10 | 8/10 | +0.13 | 60% of district |
| Rental Yield10% | 0/10 | 2/10 | −0.20 | 0% of district |
| Tenure10% | 9/10 | 10/10 | −0.10 | 6% of district |
| Future Transformation6% | 3/10 | 3/10 | ±0.00 | 13% of district |
Medians are across the 307 scored resale projects in District 10 (Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin). “Effect on score” is the factor's weighted difference from that median, so the column sums (to within rounding) to the gap between Nassim Woods and a median-profile project (5.30). “Scores above” is the share of those projects this one out-scores on the factor. Weights and bands are on the methodology page.
Nassim Woods Notes
How these numbers are worked out
- Grade D places Nassim Woods in a relative band under the current seven-factor formula. RPS is a relative comparison of seven scored factors, not a valuation, return forecast or buy recommendation. TRIBE's 2026 back-test found the composite separated later resale returns less clearly than Historical Performance alone, so the grade should be used to open the factor details, not to close a buying decision. Two units can still be very different buys: the asking price, stack, floor, facing and condition decide the outcome.
- MRT distance is a straight line on the map; the walking route is longer.
- Factor bars: the black mark on each bar is the district median.
- Score: seven weighted factors. Methodology published.
What the score cannot tell you
- RPS scores the project, not a unit. Floor, stack, facing, renovation and the asking price are outside the score.
- Nassim Woods has no row in the URA REALIS caveat dataset TRIBE uses, so no recent-price evidence is shown here. The Historical Performance factor (2/10) rests on the 10-year record.
- Historical Performance is a percentile among projects of similar vintage (completed around 1998, within a year or so, widened when the cohort is small). A high score is strong for its age group, not against the whole market.
- The nearest MRT is Napier MRT (TE12), 260 m in a straight line. The walking route is usually longer, and bus links are not scored.
- OneMap's School Query lists no primary school within 1 km of any block, so none counts toward the Primary School Effect; a school just outside the 1 km line would not appear.
- Scores updated October 2026. Nothing on this page is a valuation or advice on a specific unit.