RPS · Resale Project Scorecard
Ardmore II — Grade D
RPS score 4.30/10 · D10 · Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin · 118 units · scored across 7 weighted factors — methodology published.
FH · ACTBILT PTE LIMITED · TOP 2010
Weak project — significant gaps in multiple factors. Standout strengths: tenure. Key weaknesses: schools, total returns.
Factor breakdown
- Project's Historical Performance25% weight
- 3/10
- Primary School Effect20% weight
- 2/10
- Project Size16% weight
- 5/10
- MRT Proximity13% weight
- 7/10
- Rental Yield10% weight
- 2/10
- Tenure10% weight
- 10/10
- Future Transformation6% weight
- 4/10
Avg Ann. of +0.94% — below-median performance vs same-vintage peers (30th percentile of 2010-era cohort).
No primary schools within 1km — school access is limited, particularly for parents prioritising Primary 1 registration.
118 units — boutique development. Lower transaction frequency and limited shared facilities.
0.73km from Orchard Mrt Stn (NS22) — short walk to MRT, good transport convenience.
Rental yield of 2.22% — weak income return.
Freehold tenure — no lease decay concerns, preserves long-term value.
Limited future-catalyst exposure — nearest is Newton–Orchard mixed-use precinct at 1.20km, far enough that the impact on this project is modest.
RPSResale Project Scorecard
Scored either side of Ardmore II in Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin
The projects immediately above and below it on the Resale Project Scorecard — the comparison a buyer is usually actually making.
- Angullia Park Residences @ OrchardD4.32
- Cuscaden ResidencesD4.29
- Kum Hing CourtD4.33
- Holland CourtD4.29
- Holland Hill LodgeD4.33
- Juniper @ ArdmoreD4.29
See all 308 scored projects in Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin →