Resale Project Scorecard
Yong An Park
D09 · Orchard, River Valley · freehold · completed 1986 · 288 units
Grade A, 7.02 out of 10, the 9th highest score among 205 resale condos in District 9.
How to read this grade. RPS is a relative comparison of seven scored factors, not a valuation, return forecast or buy recommendation.
TRIBE's 2026 back-test found the composite separated later resale returns less clearly than Historical Performance alone, so the grade should be used to open the factor details, not to close a buying decision. Read the evidence →
- Tenure
- Freehold
- Resales, 12 months to Oct 2026
- 3
- To Great World MRT
- 140 m
3D model: block outlines © OpenStreetMap contributors, roof heights from OneMap 3D (SLA)
Yong An Park Score
- A
- Grade
- Score out of 10
- 7.02
- Highest score among 205 resale condos in District 9
- 9th
Strong project with clear strengths. Standout strengths: MRT access, tenure. Key weaknesses: future transformation, rental yield.
Project's Historical Performance25%7/10
Avg Ann. of +3.83% — near-median performance within its 1986-era cohort (64th percentile).
The district median is 4/10.
Primary School Effect20%7/10
1 primary school within 1km (River Valley Primary School, 0.04km away) — a well-subscribed school. Narrow optionality, but the single option is a solid one.
The district median is 7/10.
- River Valley Primary School
Within 1km on OneMap's School Query for at least one block, the measure MOE uses for Primary 1. Check your block's postal code on OneMap School Query →
Project Size16%8/10
288 units — good project size supporting active resale market and adequate facilities.
The district median is 3/10.
MRT Proximity13%10/10
140 m from Great World MRT (TE15) — direct, walk-in MRT access. Strong commuter appeal.
The district median is 9/10.
Rental Yield10%1/10
Rental yield of 2.16% — weak income return.
The district median is 3/10.
Tenure10%10/10
Freehold tenure — no lease decay concerns, preserves long-term value.
The district median is 10/10.
Future Transformation6%3/10
Limited future-catalyst exposure — nearest is Newton–Orchard mixed-use precinct at 2.04km, far enough that the impact on this project is modest.
The district median is 4/10.
Scores updated October 2026. On the map →
Why Yong An Park scores 7.02
Yong An Park scores 7.02 out of 10 on the TRIBE Resale Project Scorecard, Grade A, ranking 385th of 2,350 resale condos scored in Singapore and 9th of 205 in District 9 (Orchard, River Valley). Its strongest factors are MRT Proximity (10/10) and Tenure (10/10); its weakest is Rental Yield (1/10).
| Factor | This condoYong An Park | DistrictDistrict median | EffectEffect on score | Scores above |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project's Historical Performance25% | 7/10 | 4/10 | +0.75 | 89% of district |
| Primary School Effect20% | 7/10 | 7/10 | ±0.00 | 8% of district |
| Project Size16% | 8/10 | 3/10 | +0.80 | 83% of district |
| MRT Proximity13% | 10/10 | 9/10 | +0.13 | 77% of district |
| Rental Yield10% | 1/10 | 3/10 | −0.20 | 8% of district |
| Tenure10% | 10/10 | 10/10 | ±0.00 | 10% of district |
| Future Transformation6% | 3/10 | 4/10 | −0.06 | 0% of district |
Medians are across the 205 scored resale projects in District 9 (Orchard, River Valley). “Effect on score” is the factor's weighted difference from that median, so the column sums (to within rounding) to the gap between Yong An Park and a median-profile project (5.59). “Scores above” is the share of those projects this one out-scores on the factor. Weights and bands are on the methodology page.
Yong An Park Prices
- Median PSF
- $2,249
- Median price
- $4.80M
- Resales
- 3
- PSF on the year before
- −2.0%
Past transactions at Yong An Park
23 resales, Nov 2021 to Oct 2026 · median $2,340 psf · $2,300,000 to $15,000,000 · 15 of the 15 with a purchase on record sold at a profit
| Sale | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Sep 2026 | 333 River Valley Road | 4 | #04-05053BR · Blk 333 | 3BR | 1,765 | $2,719 | $4,800,000 | Resale |
| 9 Feb 2026 | 329 River Valley Road | 9 | #09-02024BR · Blk 329 | 4BR | 3,229 | $2,168 | $7,000,000 | Resale |
| 10 Nov 2025 | 331 River Valley Road | 3 | #03-07071BR · Blk 331 | 1BR | 1,023 | $2,249 | $2,300,000 | Resale |
| 25 Sep 2025 | 329 River Valley Road | 15 | #15-03034BR · Blk 329 | 4BR | 3,434 | $2,650 | $9,100,000 | Resale |
| 22 May 2025 | 329 River Valley Road | 13 | #13-01013BR · Blk 329 | 3BR | 3,111 | $2,250 | $7,000,000 | Resale |
| 12 Mar 2025 | 329 River Valley Road | 22 | #22-01013BR · Blk 329 | 3BR | 3,111 | $2,340 | $7,280,000 | Resale |
| 20 Feb 2025 | 329 River Valley Road | 25 | #25-03034BR · Blk 329 | 4BR | 6,878 | $2,181 | $15,000,000 | Resale |
| 12 Aug 2024 | 327 River Valley Road | 13 | #13-03034BR · Blk 327 | 4BR | 3,434 | $2,505 | $8,600,000 | Resale |
| 28 Jun 2024 | 327 River Valley Road | 17 | #17-02023BR · Blk 327 | 3BR | 3,111 | $2,218 | $6,900,000 | Resale |
| 8 Apr 2024 | 327 River Valley Road | 12 | #12-03034BR · Blk 327 | 4BR | 3,434 | $2,470 | $8,480,000 | Resale |
Show as a table
| Period | Sales | Median PSF | D9 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2021 – Jan 2022 | 1 | — | $2,153 psf |
| Feb–Apr 2022 | 2 | $2,234 psf | $2,140 psf |
| May–Jul 2022 | 2 | $1,952 psf | $2,074 psf |
| Aug–Oct 2022 | 1 | — | $2,184 psf |
| Nov 2022 – Jan 2023 | 2 | $2,349 psf | $2,193 psf |
| Feb–Apr 2023 | 2 | $2,355 psf | $2,192 psf |
| May–Jul 2023 | 1 | — | $2,138 psf |
| Aug–Oct 2023 | — | — | $2,198 psf |
| Nov 2023 – Jan 2024 | 1 | — | $2,280 psf |
| Feb–Apr 2024 | 2 | $2,425 psf | $2,165 psf |
| May–Jul 2024 | 1 | — | $2,228 psf |
| Aug–Oct 2024 | 1 | — | $2,238 psf |
| Nov 2024 – Jan 2025 | — | — | $2,301 psf |
| Feb–Apr 2025 | 2 | $2,261 psf | $2,305 psf |
| May–Jul 2025 | 1 | — | $2,306 psf |
| Aug–Oct 2025 | 1 | — | $2,265 psf |
| Nov 2025 – Jan 2026 | 1 | — | $2,331 psf |
| Feb–Apr 2026 | 1 | — | $2,420 psf |
| May–Jul 2026 | — | — | $2,395 psf |
| Aug–Oct 2026 | 1 | — | $2,245 psf |
A quarter is plotted from two sales up; the district line from ten.
URA REALIS resale and sub-sale caveats, Nov 2021 to Oct 2026. Check one unit →
Yong An Park Rent
- Median rent a month
- $4,000 to $13,500
- Rental contracts
- 61
| Unit type | Median rent | Most rents | LetsContracts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-bedroom | $4,000 | $4,000 to $4,250 | 7 |
| 2-bedroom | $4,400 | $4,200 to $4,800 | 9 |
| 3-bedroom | $8,450 | $8,150 to $9,350 | 24 |
| 4-bedroom | $13,500 | $12,800 to $14,000 | 21 |
Rental contracts at Yong An Park
61 contracts, Sep 2025 to Aug 2026 · median $8,500 a month · $3,800 to $16,000
| Month | Type | Size | Rent a month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2026 | 1BR | 1,000 to 1,100 sq ft | $3,900 |
| Aug 2026 | 2BR | 1,000 to 1,100 sq ft | $4,700 |
| Aug 2026 | 2BR | 1,000 to 1,100 sq ft | $5,200 |
| Aug 2026 | 3BR | 1,900 to 2,000 sq ft | $8,400 |
| Aug 2026 | 3BR | 1,900 to 2,000 sq ft | $8,500 |
| Aug 2026 | 3BR | 1,800 to 1,900 sq ft | $8,500 |
| Aug 2026 | 3BR | 1,700 to 1,800 sq ft | $8,800 |
| Aug 2026 | 4BR | 3,100 to 3,200 sq ft | $12,000 |
| Aug 2026 | 4BR | 3,200 to 3,300 sq ft | $12,800 |
| Aug 2026 | 4BR | 3,400 to 3,500 sq ft | $13,000 |
URA rental contracts. The table above is the 12 months to August 2026. URA publishes no unit number for a letting.
Yong An Park By stack
- Highest, stack 03
- $2,444 psf
- Lowest, stack 07
- $1,951 psf
- Stacks with 2+ resales
- 7
| Stack | Median PSF | Size | Sold on | Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | $2,209 psf | 3,111 sq ft | Levels 3 to 22 | 4 |
| 02 | $2,234 psf | 3,229 sq ft | Levels 9 to 24 | 4 |
| 03 | $2,444 psf | 3,434 sq ft | Levels 10 to 25 | 6 |
| 04 | $2,337 psf | 1,808 sq ft | Levels 6 to 7 | 2 |
| 05 | $2,379 psf | 1,765 sq ft | Levels 3 to 6 | 3 |
| 06 | $2,086 psf | 4,370 sq ft | Levels 1 to 9 | 2 |
| 07 | $1,951 psf | 1,243 sq ft | Levels 3 to 13 | 2 |
URA REALIS resale caveats, 2022 to Oct 2026. Sun path by facing →
Yong An Park Notes
How these numbers are worked out
- Grade A places Yong An Park in a relative band under the current seven-factor formula. RPS is a relative comparison of seven scored factors, not a valuation, return forecast or buy recommendation. TRIBE's 2026 back-test found the composite separated later resale returns less clearly than Historical Performance alone, so the grade should be used to open the factor details, not to close a buying decision. Two units can still be very different buys: the asking price, stack, floor, facing and condition decide the outcome.
- PSF against the district: $2,249 psf at Yong An Park against $2,356 psf across District 9, medians over 12 months.
- MRT distance is a straight line on the map; the walking route is longer.
- Prices: aggregates of URA REALIS resale caveats, data to October 2026 (Nov 2025 – Oct 2026; the year before is Nov 2024 – Oct 2025, median $2,295 psf). A specific unit's value depends on floor, size, facing and condition.
- By unit type: a price range is shown from three sales up; with two, the figure is the median. Unit types with one sale, and sales with no bedroom count on record, are left out.
- Past transactions: every resale and sub-sale caveat lodged with URA from Nov 2021 to Oct 2026, newest first; a unit is its storey and stack (#07-18). Typing a unit or a stack lists its sales across the whole span. Profit is the sale price less the seller's own purchase price as the caveats pair them, before stamp duties, fees and loan interest; the gain a year is compounded and shown from one year held. The trend line is the median from two sales up per month, quarter or half-year, the district line from ten. 10Y appears once the dataset runs that far back.
- Rent: aggregates of URA rental contracts, Sep 2025 – Aug 2026, for unit types with three contracts or more; the contract list under the table carries every letting on file, including those with no bedroom count, and URA publishes no unit number for a letting. "Most rents" is the middle half of contracts, shown from five up. No yield is shown: too few resales of these unit types in the last 12 months to divide by.
- By stack: resales from 2022 to Oct 2026, medians per stack. A stack is the last two digits of the unit number, so #05-37 and #08-37 are both stack 37. Stacks with one sale are left out, and prices moved over the period, so read a gap between two stacks as a lead to check, not a rule.
- Factor bars: the black mark on each bar is the district median.
- Score: seven weighted factors. Methodology published.
What the score cannot tell you
- RPS scores the project, not a unit. Floor, stack, facing, renovation and the asking price are outside the score. In the 12 months to October 2026, the 3 resale caveats at Yong An Park ranged from $2,168 psf to $2,719 psf: that spread is unit-level variation the score cannot see.
- Recent price evidence is thin: 3 resale caveats in the 12 months to October 2026. The Historical Performance factor (7/10) rests on the 10-year record, not on this window.
- Historical Performance is a percentile among projects of similar vintage (completed around 1986, within a year or so, widened when the cohort is small). A high score is strong for its age group, not against the whole market.
- The nearest MRT is Great World MRT (TE15), 140 m in a straight line. The walking route is usually longer, and bus links are not scored.
- Primary School Effect counts the one primary school within 1 km on OneMap's School Query (the school's land boundary to the block's building outline, the measure MOE uses for P1), weighted by recent P1 ballot demand. A school counts when any block is within 1 km, so confirm your own block's postal code before relying on it.
- Scores updated October 2026; transactions to October 2026. Nothing on this page is a valuation or advice on a specific unit.
- Facing decides a unit's morning or afternoon sun, and it varies stack by stack. See the sun path at Yong An Park for any facing, date and time → The hours count direction only; the 3D map draws the shadows of the blocks around it.