RPS · Resale Project Scorecard
Four Seasons Park — Grade C
RPS score 5.07/10 · D10 · Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin · 202 units · scored across 7 weighted factors — methodology published.
FH · HPL Properties Pte Ltd · TOP 1994
Below-average project with notable weaknesses. Standout strengths: tenure, MRT access. Key weaknesses: schools, total returns.
Factor breakdown
- Project's Historical Performance25% weight
- 4/10
- Primary School Effect20% weight
- 2/10
- Project Size16% weight
- 8/10
- MRT Proximity13% weight
- 9/10
- Rental Yield10% weight
- 0/10
- Tenure10% weight
- 10/10
- Future Transformation6% weight
- 4/10
Avg Ann. of +2.93% — below-median performance vs same-vintage peers (35th percentile of 1994-era cohort).
No primary schools within 1km — school access is limited, particularly for parents prioritising Primary 1 registration.
202 units — good project size supporting active resale market and adequate facilities.
320m from Orchard Mrt Stn (TE14) — direct, walk-in MRT access. Strong commuter appeal.
Rental yield of 1.89% — weak income return.
Freehold tenure — no lease decay concerns, preserves long-term value.
Limited future-catalyst exposure — nearest is Newton–Orchard mixed-use precinct at 1.53km, far enough that the impact on this project is modest.
See live Four Seasons Park listings for sale on PropertyGuru →
The verdict· Scores updated September 2026
Four Seasons Park scores 5.07 out of 10 on the TRIBE Resale Project Scorecard, Grade C, ranking 1880th of 2,357 resale condos scored in Singapore and 178th of 308 in District 10 (Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin). Its strongest factors are Tenure (10/10) and MRT Proximity (9/10); its weakest is Rental Yield (0/10). Below-average project with notable weaknesses. Standout strengths: tenure, MRT access. Key weaknesses: schools, total returns.
See all 308 scored condos in District 10 (Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin) →
RPS · Resale Project Scorecard
Recent resale transactions at Four Seasons Park
12 months to September 2026 (Oct 2025 – Sep 2026): 5 resale transactions, median $3,454 psf, median price $9.28M. Median PSF is up 2.7% on the previous 12 months (Oct 2024 – Sep 2025, $3,364 psf).
| Period | Transactions | Median PSF | Median price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct–Dec 2025 | 2 | $3,209 psf | $9.95M |
| Jan–Mar 2026 | — | — | — |
| Apr–Jun 2026 | 2 | $3,447 psf | $11.6M |
| Jul–Sep 2026 | 1 | $3,487 psf | $7.88M |
| 12-month total | 5 | $3,454 psf | $9.28M |
Aggregates of URA REALIS resale caveats (data to September 2026). A specific unit's value depends on floor, size, facing and condition — for a unit-level read, use the Resale Price Check.
Four Seasons Park: frequently asked questions
Answers generated from the scorecard data — RPS rank 1880th of 2,357, scores updated September 2026.
- Is Four Seasons Park a good buy in 2026?
- Four Seasons Park scores 5.07/10 on the TRIBE Resale Project Scorecard (Grade C), which places it 1880th of 2,357 Singapore resale condos and 178th of 308 in District 10 (Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin). Below-average project with notable weaknesses. Standout strengths: tenure, MRT access. Key weaknesses: schools, total returns. RPS scores project-level demand fundamentals — not a specific unit or its asking price — so read the grade as a screen: it tells you whether the drivers of resale demand are present, and the price you pay still decides the outcome.
- What is the average PSF at Four Seasons Park?
- In the 12 months to September 2026 (Oct 2025 – Sep 2026), URA REALIS records 5 resale transactions at Four Seasons Park, at a median of $3,454 psf and a median price of $9.28M (range $2,964 psf to $3,664 psf). The median PSF is up 2.7% on the previous 12 months (Oct 2024 – Sep 2025, $3,364 psf). Figures are aggregates of caveats lodged with URA; a specific unit's value depends on floor, size, facing and condition.
- How far is Four Seasons Park from the nearest MRT station?
- Four Seasons Park is about 320m from Orchard MRT (TE14), scoring 9/10 on the MRT Proximity factor (13% of the RPS score). Distances are straight-line, and confirmed upcoming stations are also considered.
- How does Four Seasons Park compare with The Siena?
- The Siena is the project scored next to Four Seasons Park on the District 10 ranking: 5.09 (Grade C) against Four Seasons Park's 5.07 (Grade C). Four Seasons Park scores higher on Project Size (8 vs 3) and Project's Historical Performance (4 vs 2); The Siena scores higher on Primary School Effect (2 vs 7) and Rental Yield (0 vs 5).
- What is the tenure of Four Seasons Park, and how big is the project?
- Four Seasons Park is freehold, completed in 1994, has 202 units, developed by HPL Properties Pte Ltd. Freehold tenure — no lease decay concerns, preserves long-term value. 202 units — good project size supporting active resale market and adequate facilities. Tenure carries 10% of the RPS score and Project Size 16%.
Scored either side of Four Seasons Park in Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin
The projects immediately above and below it on the Resale Project Scorecard — the comparison a buyer is usually actually making.
See all 308 scored projects in Bukit Timah, Holland, Tanglin →
Free condo report
Email me this condo's report
Get the full report on Four Seasons Park — PSF trends, rival comparison, and our verdict — in your inbox.