Resale Project Scorecard
Tan Tong Meng Tower
D11 · Newton, Novena · freehold · completed 1977 · 35 units
Grade C, 5.00 out of 10, the 134th highest score among 143 resale condos in District 11.
How to read this grade. RPS is a relative comparison of seven scored factors, not a valuation, return forecast or buy recommendation.
TRIBE's 2026 back-test found the composite separated later resale returns less clearly than Historical Performance alone, so the grade should be used to open the factor details, not to close a buying decision. Read the evidence →
- Tenure
- Freehold
- Resales, 12 months to Oct 2026
- 2
- To Novena MRT
- 800 m
3D model: block outlines © OpenStreetMap contributors, roof heights from OneMap 3D (SLA)
Tan Tong Meng Tower Score
- C
- Grade
- Score out of 10
- 5.00
- Highest score among 143 resale condos in District 11
- 134th
Below-average project with notable weaknesses. Standout strengths: tenure. Key weaknesses: project size, rental yield.
Project's Historical Performance25%4/10
Avg Ann. of +1.96% — below-median performance vs same-vintage peers (34th percentile of 1977-era cohort).
The district median is 5/10.
Primary School Effect20%7/10
1 primary school within 1km (CHIJ Primary (Toa Payoh), 0.52km away) — a well-subscribed school. Narrow optionality, but the single option is a solid one.
The district median is 8/10.
- CHIJ Primary (Toa Payoh)
Within 1km on OneMap's School Query for at least one block, the measure MOE uses for Primary 1. Check your block's postal code on OneMap School Query →
Project Size16%3/10
35 units — very small project; niche product with thin resale market.
The district median is 3/10.
MRT Proximity13%7/10
800 m from Novena MRT (NS20) — short walk to MRT, good transport convenience.
The district median is 8/10.
Rental Yield10%0/10
Rental yield of 1.80% — weak income return.
The district median is 3/10.
Tenure10%10/10
Freehold tenure — no lease decay concerns, preserves long-term value.
The district median is 10/10.
Future Transformation6%3/10
Limited future-catalyst exposure — nearest is Newton–Orchard mixed-use precinct at 1.69km, far enough that the impact on this project is modest.
The district median is 4/10.
Scores updated October 2026. On the map →
Why Tan Tong Meng Tower scores 5.00
Tan Tong Meng Tower scores 5.00 out of 10 on the TRIBE Resale Project Scorecard, Grade C, ranking 1980th of 2,350 resale condos scored in Singapore and 134th of 143 in District 11 (Newton, Novena). Its strongest factors are Tenure (10/10) and Primary School Effect (7/10); its weakest is Rental Yield (0/10).
| Factor | This condoTan Tong Meng Tower | DistrictDistrict median | EffectEffect on score | Scores above |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project's Historical Performance25% | 4/10 | 5/10 | −0.25 | 23% of district |
| Primary School Effect20% | 7/10 | 8/10 | −0.20 | 9% of district |
| Project Size16% | 3/10 | 3/10 | ±0.00 | 0% of district |
| MRT Proximity13% | 7/10 | 8/10 | −0.13 | 6% of district |
| Rental Yield10% | 0/10 | 3/10 | −0.30 | 0% of district |
| Tenure10% | 10/10 | 10/10 | ±0.00 | 6% of district |
| Future Transformation6% | 3/10 | 4/10 | −0.06 | 0% of district |
Medians are across the 143 scored resale projects in District 11 (Newton, Novena). “Effect on score” is the factor's weighted difference from that median, so the column sums (to within rounding) to the gap between Tan Tong Meng Tower and a median-profile project (5.91). “Scores above” is the share of those projects this one out-scores on the factor. Weights and bands are on the methodology page.
Tan Tong Meng Tower Prices
By unit type at Tan Tong Meng Tower
| Unit type | Size | Sold for | Median PSF | Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-bedroom3,240 sq ft | 3,240 sq ft | $3.92M | $1,212 psf | 2 |
Past transactions at Tan Tong Meng Tower
2 resales, Nov 2021 to Oct 2026 · median $1,212 psf · $3,650,000 to $4,200,000
| Sale | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Apr 2026 | 370 Thomson Road | 13 | #13-3723724BR | 4BR | 3,240 | $1,296 | $4,200,000 | Resale |
| 12 Feb 2026 | 370 Thomson Road | 9 | #09-3703704BR | 4BR | 3,240 | $1,127 | $3,650,000 | Resale |
Show as a table
| Period | Sales | Median PSF | D11 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2021 – Jan 2022 | — | — | $1,758 psf |
| Feb–Apr 2022 | — | — | $1,806 psf |
| May–Jul 2022 | — | — | $1,837 psf |
| Aug–Oct 2022 | — | — | $1,783 psf |
| Nov 2022 – Jan 2023 | — | — | $1,854 psf |
| Feb–Apr 2023 | — | — | $1,929 psf |
| May–Jul 2023 | — | — | $1,951 psf |
| Aug–Oct 2023 | — | — | $1,943 psf |
| Nov 2023 – Jan 2024 | — | — | $1,942 psf |
| Feb–Apr 2024 | — | — | $1,969 psf |
| May–Jul 2024 | — | — | $2,009 psf |
| Aug–Oct 2024 | — | — | $2,014 psf |
| Nov 2024 – Jan 2025 | — | — | $2,032 psf |
| Feb–Apr 2025 | — | — | $2,024 psf |
| May–Jul 2025 | — | — | $2,092 psf |
| Aug–Oct 2025 | — | — | $2,086 psf |
| Nov 2025 – Jan 2026 | — | — | $2,019 psf |
| Feb–Apr 2026 | 2 | $1,212 psf | $2,055 psf |
| May–Jul 2026 | — | — | $2,030 psf |
| Aug–Oct 2026 | — | — | $2,094 psf |
A quarter is plotted from two sales up; the district line from ten.
URA REALIS resale and sub-sale caveats, Nov 2021 to Oct 2026. Check one unit →
Tan Tong Meng Tower Rent
- Median rent a month
- $6,000
- Gross yield
- 1.8%
- Rental contracts
- 8
| Unit type | Median rent | Most rents | Gross yield | LetsContracts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-bedroom | $6,000 | $5,870 to $6,450 | 1.8% | 8 |
Rental contracts at Tan Tong Meng Tower
8 contracts, Sep 2025 to Aug 2026 · median $6,000 a month · $4,300 to $7,500
| Month | Type | Size | Rent a month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | 4BR | 3,200 to 3,300 sq ft | $6,000 |
| May 2026 | 4BR | 3,200 to 3,300 sq ft | $5,900 |
| Mar 2026 | 4BR | 3,200 to 3,300 sq ft | $7,500 |
| Feb 2026 | 4BR | 3,200 to 3,300 sq ft | $5,760 |
| Feb 2026 | 4BR | 3,200 to 3,300 sq ft | $7,200 |
| Jan 2026 | 4BR | 3,200 to 3,300 sq ft | $6,000 |
| Nov 2025 | 4BR | 3,200 to 3,300 sq ft | $6,200 |
| Sep 2025 | 4BR | 3,200 to 3,300 sq ft | $4,300 |
URA rental contracts. The table above is the 12 months to August 2026. Yield is gross. URA publishes no unit number for a letting.
Tan Tong Meng Tower Notes
How these numbers are worked out
- Grade C places Tan Tong Meng Tower in a relative band under the current seven-factor formula. RPS is a relative comparison of seven scored factors, not a valuation, return forecast or buy recommendation. TRIBE's 2026 back-test found the composite separated later resale returns less clearly than Historical Performance alone, so the grade should be used to open the factor details, not to close a buying decision. Two units can still be very different buys: the asking price, stack, floor, facing and condition decide the outcome.
- PSF against the district: $1,212 psf at Tan Tong Meng Tower against $2,048 psf across District 11, medians over 12 months.
- MRT distance is a straight line on the map; the walking route is longer.
- Prices: aggregates of URA REALIS resale caveats, data to October 2026 (Nov 2025 – Oct 2026). A specific unit's value depends on floor, size, facing and condition.
- By unit type: a price range is shown from three sales up; with two, the figure is the median.
- Past transactions: every resale and sub-sale caveat lodged with URA from Nov 2021 to Oct 2026, newest first; a unit is its storey and stack (#07-18). Typing a unit or a stack lists its sales across the whole span. Profit is the sale price less the seller's own purchase price as the caveats pair them, before stamp duties, fees and loan interest; the gain a year is compounded and shown from one year held. The trend line is the median from two sales up per month, quarter or half-year, the district line from ten. 10Y appears once the dataset runs that far back.
- Rent: aggregates of URA rental contracts, Sep 2025 – Aug 2026, for unit types with three contracts or more; the contract list under the table carries every letting on file, including those with no bedroom count, and URA publishes no unit number for a letting. "Most rents" is the middle half of contracts, shown from five up. Gross yield is a year of the median rent over the median resale price of the same unit type (12 months to October 2026, two sales or more), before maintenance fees, property tax, agent fees, vacancy and mortgage interest.
- Factor bars: the black mark on each bar is the district median.
- Score: seven weighted factors. Methodology published.
What the score cannot tell you
- RPS scores the project, not a unit. Floor, stack, facing, renovation and the asking price are outside the score. In the 12 months to October 2026, the 2 resale caveats at Tan Tong Meng Tower ranged from $1,127 psf to $1,296 psf: that spread is unit-level variation the score cannot see.
- Recent price evidence is thin: 2 resale caveats in the 12 months to October 2026. The Historical Performance factor (4/10) rests on the 10-year record, not on this window.
- Historical Performance is a percentile among projects of similar vintage (completed around 1977, within a year or so, widened when the cohort is small). A high score is strong for its age group, not against the whole market.
- The nearest MRT is Novena MRT (NS20), 800 m in a straight line. The walking route is usually longer, and bus links are not scored.
- Primary School Effect counts the one primary school within 1 km on OneMap's School Query (the school's land boundary to the block's building outline, the measure MOE uses for P1), weighted by recent P1 ballot demand. A school counts when any block is within 1 km, so confirm your own block's postal code before relying on it.
- Scores updated October 2026; transactions to October 2026. Nothing on this page is a valuation or advice on a specific unit.
- Facing decides a unit's morning or afternoon sun, and it varies stack by stack. See the sun path at Tan Tong Meng Tower for any facing, date and time → The hours count direction only; the 3D map draws the shadows of the blocks around it.