RPS · Resale Project Scorecard
12 On Shan — Grade D
RPS score 4.45/10 · D12 · Balestier, Toa Payoh · 78 units · scored across 7 weighted factors — methodology published.
FH · Bukit Sembawang Estates · TOP 2018
Weak project — significant gaps in multiple factors. Standout strengths: tenure, MRT access. Key weaknesses: project size, schools.
Factor breakdown
- Project's Historical Performance25% weight
- 5/10
- Primary School Effect20% weight
- 1/10
- Project Size16% weight
- 3/10
- MRT Proximity13% weight
- 8/10
- Rental Yield10% weight
- 3/10
- Tenure10% weight
- 10/10
- Future Transformation6% weight
- 3/10
Avg Ann. of +0.00% — but from only 1 resale sale in the last 10 years, too thin a sample to read capital appreciation reliably, so the score is discounted toward the cohort average.
School proximity could not be measured — address geocoding incomplete for this development.
78 units — very small project; niche product with thin resale market.
0.56km from Novena Mrt Stn (NS20) — short walk to MRT, good transport convenience.
District rental yield 2.90% used as proxy (project-level rental data unavailable) — below-average yield for the area.
Freehold tenure — no lease decay concerns, preserves long-term value.
No usable coordinates for this project — Future Transformation defaulted to a neutral 3/10 pending geocode fix.
The verdict· Scores updated September 2026
12 On Shan scores 4.45 out of 10 on the TRIBE Resale Project Scorecard, Grade D, ranking 2189th of 2,357 resale condos scored in Singapore and 112th of 116 in District 12 (Balestier, Toa Payoh). Its strongest factors are Tenure (10/10) and MRT Proximity (8/10); its weakest is Primary School Effect (1/10). Weak project — significant gaps in multiple factors. Standout strengths: tenure, MRT access. Key weaknesses: project size, schools.
See all 116 scored condos in District 12 (Balestier, Toa Payoh) →
RPS · Resale Project Scorecard
12 On Shan: frequently asked questions
Answers generated from the scorecard data — RPS rank 2189th of 2,357, scores updated September 2026.
- Is 12 On Shan a good buy in 2026?
- 12 On Shan scores 4.45/10 on the TRIBE Resale Project Scorecard (Grade D), which places it 2189th of 2,357 Singapore resale condos and 112th of 116 in District 12 (Balestier, Toa Payoh). Weak project — significant gaps in multiple factors. Standout strengths: tenure, MRT access. Key weaknesses: project size, schools. RPS scores project-level demand fundamentals — not a specific unit or its asking price — so read the grade as a screen: it tells you whether the drivers of resale demand are present, and the price you pay still decides the outcome.
- How far is 12 On Shan from the nearest MRT station?
- 12 On Shan is about 560m from Novena MRT (NS20), scoring 8/10 on the MRT Proximity factor (13% of the RPS score). Distances are straight-line, and confirmed upcoming stations are also considered.
- How does 12 On Shan compare with Kingsley Mansions?
- Kingsley Mansions is the project scored next to 12 On Shan on the District 12 ranking: 4.53 (Grade D) against 12 On Shan's 4.45 (Grade D). 12 On Shan scores higher on MRT Proximity (8 vs 7); Kingsley Mansions scores higher on Primary School Effect (1 vs 2).
- What is the tenure of 12 On Shan, and how big is the project?
- 12 On Shan is freehold, completed in 2018, has 78 units, developed by Bukit Sembawang Estates. Freehold tenure — no lease decay concerns, preserves long-term value. 78 units — very small project; niche product with thin resale market. Tenure carries 10% of the RPS score and Project Size 16%.
Scored either side of 12 On Shan in Balestier, Toa Payoh
The projects immediately above and below it on the Resale Project Scorecard — the comparison a buyer is usually actually making.
Free condo report
Email me this condo's report
Get the full report on 12 On Shan — PSF trends, rival comparison, and our verdict — in your inbox.