
Insights
The Widest Bid Gap of 2026: What United Venture Is Really Pricing at New Upper Changi
Four bids closed at New Upper Changi Road today. The top one, S$1,425,388,000 from United Venture Development (Daisy) and CL Sapphire, sits 13.85% above second place — the widest top-to-second gap of any URA residential tender this year, against a 2026 median of 4.26%. At S$1,537 psf of gross floor area, it is not a record. It is a conviction bet, and this is the arithmetic underneath it.
By TRIBE Editorial · 1 September 2026 · 10 min read
URA closed the tender for the New Upper Changi Road residential site today with four bids in hand. The headline number is large but unremarkable by 2026 standards; the distance between first and second place is neither. United Venture Development (Daisy) and CL Sapphire committed S$173.4 million more than the next bidder for the same piece of ground — a gap more than three times the year's median, on a site where the other three bidders effectively agreed with each other.
What actually closed today
The site was released on 15 May 2026 under the 1H2026 Confirmed List, alongside Berlayar Drive. URA's own particulars: 30,769.0 sqm of land, a maximum permissible gross floor area of 86,154 sqm — a gross plot ratio of 2.80 — on a 99-year lease, near Bedok MRT, with an indicative yield of about 1,010 homes.
Four bids, as published in Annex A:
| Rank | Tenderer | Bid | S$PSM of GFA | S$ psf GFA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Venture Development (Daisy) and CL Sapphire | S$1,425,388,000 | S$16,544.65 | S$1,537 |
| 2 | CDL Constellation and Hong Realty | S$1,252,000,000 | S$14,532.12 | S$1,350 |
| 3 | GuocoLand (Singapore) and Apricate | S$1,242,664,619 | S$14,423.76 | S$1,340 |
| 4 | Sim Lian Land and Sim Lian Development | S$1,215,000,000 | S$14,102.65 | S$1,310 |
The psf figures are ours, converted at 1 sqm = 10.7639 sq ft; URA publishes only the per-square-metre rate. And the important housekeeping: this is a tender closing, not an award. URA states plainly that a decision follows evaluation, and it has declined to award before.
What a land bid actually prices
A developer's bid is not an opinion about land. It is a residual: take the price the finished homes are expected to fetch, subtract everything it costs to build and sell them, subtract the profit the board demands, and whatever remains is what you can pay for the dirt. We set out the full chain in how to read a land bid; the short version is that a land price is a launch price forecast wearing a disguise.
That forecast has a deadline attached. Under IRAS rules a housing developer pays 40% ABSD, of which 35% is remitted upfront only if it commences within two years and completes and sells every unit within five years of acquisition; the other 5% is never remitted. The bid is a commitment to clear roughly 1,010 homes inside five years at a price the bidder has already implicitly named.
From S$1,537 psf of land to a selling price
Here is that name, computed. Every line below the land price is an assumption, labelled as one, because none of it has been published by anyone.
| Cost line | Total | S$ per sq ft GFA | S$ per sq ft saleable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land — URA top bid, 1 Sep 2026 | S$1,425m | S$1,537 | S$1,808 |
| Stamp duties — BSD plus 5% non-remittable ABSD | S$157m | S$169 | S$199 |
| Construction — assumed S$430 psf GFA | S$399m | S$430 | S$506 |
| Consultants, contingency, statutory — assumed 8% of construction | S$32m | S$34 | S$40 |
| Debt financing — assumed 4.0% p.a., 70% of land over 4 years, 80% of build drawn over 3 | S$180m | S$194 | S$229 |
| Total before marketing and profit | S$2,193m | S$2,365 | S$2,782 |
Two more assumptions do the rest of the work. Strata saleable area is taken at 85% of GFA — 788,250 sq ft — and marketing plus agency commissions at 3% of gross development value. On those inputs the project breaks even at S$2,868 psf, and needs about S$3,273 psf to return a 12% margin on GDV. At that price the land alone is 55% of the sale proceeds, and S$1.41 million of land sits under each of the 1,010 homes before a single pile is driven.
Move the assumptions and the answer moves with them. This is the honest range, not a forecast:
| Construction cost | 80% efficiency | 85% efficiency | 90% efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| S$380 psf GFA | S$2,975 | S$2,800 | S$2,644 |
| S$430 psf GFA | S$3,048 | S$2,868 | S$2,709 |
| S$480 psf GFA | S$3,120 | S$2,937 | S$2,774 |
A useful sanity check runs the other way. Across recent Singapore projects the land rate has landed at roughly 48% to 54% of the eventual launch price — the ratio we tracked in our Berlayar Drive analysis. Applied to S$1,537 psf, that convention implies S$2,846 to S$3,202 psf. Two different methods, one overlapping answer.
What a 13.85% gap tells you
Now the part that makes this tender unusual. Bids two, three and four are separated by 0.75% and 2.28% — three independent teams, three different cost bases, and effectively the same number. That is what a well-priced site normally looks like: consensus. The top bid sits 15.27% above the average of the other three.
Set that against every 2026 URA residential tender that drew more than one bid:
| Tender closed | Site | Bids | Top-to-second gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Sep | New Upper Changi Road | 4 | 13.85% |
| 11 Jun | Peck Hay Road | 4 | 8.44% |
| 15 Jul | Bayshore Drive | 3 | 5.83% |
| 3 Mar | Lentor Central | 5 | 5.73% |
| 26 Mar | Dover Drive | 6 | 4.37% |
| 18 Jun | River Valley Green (Parcel C) | 4 | 4.14% |
| 28 Apr | Dunearn Road | 6 | 3.09% |
| 5 Feb | Tanjong Rhu Road | 5 | 2.51% |
| 7 Apr | Kallang Close | 4 | 0.71% |
| 22 Jan | Dairy Farm Walk | 5 | 0.37% |
Read it carefully, because the gap is genuinely ambiguous. One reading: the winner sees something the market does not — a Bedok MRT catchment, an 1,010-unit scale that spreads fixed costs, a pipeline gap in the east. The other reading: they left S$173 million on the table, because the price needed to beat CDL was S$1,252,000,001.
The distinction matters to buyers because of what the build-up above showed. On identical assumptions, the second bidder's land price implies a breakeven of S$2,591 psf against the winner's S$2,868 — a S$277 psf difference in what the eventual project must charge. The bid gap does not stay in the developer's accounts. It arrives, roughly three years later, in the price list.
Four bids is a normal field, not a thin one. That is the sharpest contrast with the story we have been tracking all year: Holland Plain and Berlayar Drive each drew a single bid and still cleared at high rates, which we read as thin fields producing record prices. New Upper Changi is the opposite configuration — adequate competition, and the outlier is the winner rather than the field.
Where this sits, and what it does not prove
At S$1,537 psf of GFA this is the third-highest rate paid for a pure-residential government site in 2026, behind Peck Hay Road at S$1,865 and River Valley Green Parcel C at S$1,730, and just ahead of Berlayar Drive at S$1,515. Calling it a record would be wrong, and the year's genuine record rates were set in June in far more central locations.
What it does do is set a floor in the east while the market it will sell into is flat. URA's 2Q2026 statistics, released 24 July, show overall private residential prices up 0.5% in the quarter and 1.4% across 1H2026 — with non-landed prices in the Outside Central Region down 0.1%. Supply is not the constraint either: 9,320 Confirmed List units for full-year 2026, over 50% above the ten-year average, with roughly 60,600 private units completing in the next few years. What that pipeline means is set out in 2026's supply programme and the 2H2026 launch calendar.
For a buyer looking east, the consequence is timing rather than price panic. Land bought today will not reach a showflat before roughly 2028, and the pricing above is a projection contingent on a market nobody has seen. Meanwhile the resale stock around Bedok and Tanah Merah is priced against today's conditions, not against this tender — the comparison worth running, with the method here.
One bidder was certain enough to pay 13.85% more than three professional rivals. Certainty is not information. It is a position, and it has not been evaluated yet — URA has not awarded this site.
Sources: bid table, site area, GFA, lease and tender dates from URA's 1 September 2026 press release and its Annex A; site release details and the ~1,010-unit indicative yield from URA's 15 May 2026 release; 2026 comparable tender results computed from URA's published Annex A tables for each tender closing (Dairy Farm Walk 22 Jan, Tanjong Rhu Road 5 Feb, Lentor Central 3 Mar, Dover Drive 26 Mar, Kallang Close 7 Apr, Dunearn Road 28 Apr, Holland Plain 7 May, Peck Hay Road 11 Jun, River Valley Green Parcel C 18 Jun, Bayshore Drive 15 Jul, Berlayar Drive 4 Aug); price index and supply figures from URA's 2Q2026 real estate statistics, 24 July 2026; developer ABSD rates and the five-year remission conditions from IRAS, and buyer's stamp duty rates from IRAS's published schedule, both current as at 1 September 2026. All psf conversions, bid gaps and the breakeven build-up are computed by TRIBE at 1 sqm = 10.7639 sq ft. The breakeven is driven by four assumptions that are not published anywhere and that we have chosen: construction at S$430 psf GFA, consultants and contingency at 8% of construction, debt at 4.0% per annum on 70% of land for four years and 80% of build costs over three, strata saleable area at 85% of GFA, plus 3% marketing and commissions and a 12% target margin on GDV. Change any one and the output changes; the sensitivity table shows by how much. Breakeven and target prices are projections, not forecasts of transacted prices, and no outcome is guaranteed. This article is general information, not financial advice.
Check how your condo scores
2,357 condos independently scored across 7 weighted factors. No registration required.
Score my resale →Prefer a personal read on your situation? Arrange a consultation →Keep reading

TRIBE Editorial · Reviewed by Silas Tan
Co-Founder, TRIBE · District Director, Huttons Asia · Ex-Mortgage Banker (AVP) · >1,000 families advised · CEA R000303I
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice.


