
Insights
The Rules Were Meant to Cool EC Land Bids. The First Site Under Them Set a Record.
Four agencies forecast between two and five bids for the Canberra Drive EC site, at $600 to $700 per plot ratio foot. It drew thirteen bids at $825 — the most for an EC site in more than eight years, and a record land rate.
By TRIBE Editorial · 3 October 2026 · 11 min read
On 8 May 2026 the government tightened the rules on executive condominiums: the minimum occupation period went from five years to ten, the deferred payment scheme was removed, and the first-timer allocation at launch rose from 70% to 90%. National Development Minister Chee Hong Tat said the measures were expected to "result in developers reducing their bids and the prices for their ECs."
The first EC site tendered entirely under those rules closed at noon on 1 October. It drew thirteen bids — the most for an EC parcel in more than eight years — and a top bid of $163,903,000, or $825 per square foot per plot ratio. That is a record land rate for an executive condominium site, and it is above the top of every forecast published before the tender.
What four agencies expected, and what happened
This is unusually well documented, because the tightened rules made the site a test case and everybody published a number before it closed.
| Forecast, pre-tender | Bids expected | Top bid expected |
|---|---|---|
| PropNex | 2–4 | $620–$660 psf ppr |
| ERA (Eugene Lim) | 2–3 | $650–$700 psf ppr |
| Huttons (Mark Yip) | ~5 | $630–$700 psf ppr |
| EdgeProp's summary of consensus | 3–5 | $600–$700 psf ppr |
| Actual | 13 | $825 psf ppr |
Every range missed, all in the same direction. The actual rate is 17.9% above the top of ERA's, Huttons' and the consensus ranges, and 25.0% above the top of PropNex's. The bid count came in at roughly three times the highest estimate.
It is worth being precise about what that does and does not show. It does not show that the forecasters were careless — they were pricing a policy change whose intended effect was to reduce bids, and reading it the way the policy was written. It shows that developers priced something else, and that whatever they priced was not in any of the four models.
The arithmetic of the bid
HDB's tender document sets the site's maximum gross floor area at 18,457 square metres, or 198,669 square feet. The winning $163,903,000 divides into that at exactly $825.00 per plot ratio foot.
| Parcel | Value |
|---|---|
| Location | Canberra Drive, bounded by Jalan Sendudok, District 27 |
| Site area | 11,535.4 sqm (124,166 sq ft) |
| Gross plot ratio | 1.6 |
| Maximum gross floor area | 18,457 sqm (198,669 sq ft) |
| Minimum gross floor area | 16,611 sqm |
| Height control | 40 m Singapore Height Datum |
| Tenure | 99 years |
| Estimated units | about 185 |
| Land cost per unit | about $885,962 |
Two features of the parcel matter more than its price. The plot ratio of 1.6 is the second-lowest in the whole run of EC land sales — only the Sembawang Road site at 1.4 is lower. And at roughly 185 units it is small: Mark Yip called it "possibly the smallest EC site ever" before the tender, and said the bite-size quantum might attract developers for exactly that reason. A record rate on a low-density, low-quantum parcel is a different thing from a record rate on a large one, because the total cheque is smaller. At $163.9 million the winning bid is about a third of the $484 million Sim Lian paid for the second Woodlands Drive 17 site in January.
Thirteen bids, and a spread of 128.5%
The bid book is the more informative half of this result. The top three bids sit within 3.4% of each other — $825.00, $802.51 and $798.31 — and then it falls away.
| Tenderer (as HDB names them) | Bid | psf ppr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SNC3 Realty, HS Invesco and Kay Lim Realty | $163,903,000 | $825.00 |
| 2 | Intrepid Investments and TID Residential | $159,434,000 | $802.51 |
| 3 | Apex Asia Beta Investment Three, BHCC Development and HSB Developments | $158,600,000 | $798.31 |
| 4 | CRF Land | $153,000,000 | $770.12 |
| 5 | CDL Constellation | $146,099,000 | $735.39 |
| … | |||
| 13 | Sim Lian Land and Sim Lian Development | $71,718,787 | $361.00 |
The top bid is 2.80% above the second and 128.5% above the thirteenth. ERA's Eugene Lim read that spread as the caution in the result: "Strong turnout this time does not mean caution has been thrown to the wind," he said, noting that a spread that wide "reveals vastly differing outlooks." He is right that both things are in the data. Sim Lian — which won the Woodlands Drive 17 site in January at $794 — bid $361 here. The same company that set the previous record bid 56% below it on this parcel.
What the bidders were probably pricing
Two offsetting changes landed between the announcement and the close, and the analysts who commented after the result pointed at the same one.
The EC monthly household income ceiling was raised to $18,000 in August 2026, four months after the rules were tightened and two months before this tender closed. Mark Yip said developers "may have viewed [it] as widening the pool of eligible buyers." Nicholas Mak of Mogul.sg put it as a wager: "Developers are betting [the] effect of [the] increase in income ceiling will more than negate [the] cooling effect [of the 10-year MOP]." SRI's Mohan Sandrasegeran added the parcel's own scale — "the relatively smaller scale of the Canberra Drive EC site may have given developers greater confidence."
The second thing they were pricing is the recent record of EC launches actually selling. Rivelle Tampines launched in March 2026 at an average $1,893 psf, sold 92.5% of its 572 units on the launch weekend and was fully sold within a month. Coastal Cabana moved 67% of 748 units in January at $1,734 psf. On that evidence a ten-year MOP has not yet been observed to deter buyers, because no project sold under it has launched.
What it implies for the launch price
PropNex's Wong Siew Ying projects an average selling price "around $1,900 psf." Nicholas Mak puts the likely median at $1,850 to $1,920 psf. No analyst we could find has published a breakeven figure for this site, so we are not printing one.
Set $1,900 against what already exists on the same road:
| Project (Canberra area) | Type | Avg psf, trailing 12 months |
|---|---|---|
| Canberra Crescent Residences | Private condo, new sale | $2,002 |
| The Commodore | Private condo | $1,714 |
| The Watergardens at Canberra | Private condo | $1,710 |
| Provence Residence | EC | $1,577 |
| The Brownstone | EC | $1,523 |
| The Visionaire | EC | $1,510 |
| Parc Canberra | EC | $1,394 |
A $1,900 launch would sit 20% to 36% above every resale EC in the immediate catchment, 11% above the best-performing private condo resale, and about 5% below the new-sale average at Canberra Crescent Residences. The Visionaire and The Brownstone are directly opposite the site. Their own land was bought at $353 and — for Parc Canberra, next door — $558 per plot ratio foot. The land under this parcel cost $825.
The record in context, and the next reading
$825 is a record, but the series it tops has been climbing steadily rather than jumping.
| EC site | Tender closed | Bids | psf ppr |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canberra Drive | 1 Oct 2026 | 13 | $825 |
| Miltonia Close | 14 Apr 2026 | 3 | $732 |
| Woodlands Drive 17 (2nd) | 13 Jan 2026 | 3 | $794 |
| Sembawang Road | 11 Sep 2025 | 4 | $692 |
| Woodlands Drive 17 (1st) | 5 Aug 2025 | 5 | $782 |
| Senja Close | 5 Aug 2025 | 5 | $771 |
| Tampines Street 95 | 24 Oct 2024 | 5 | $768 |
| Jalan Loyang Besar | 1 Aug 2024 | 4 | $729 |
| Tampines Street 62 (B) | 18 Jul 2023 | 9 | $721 |
| Sumang Walk | 27 Feb 2018 | 17 | $583 |
$825 is +3.9% on the January record, +13.2% on the Jalan Loyang Besar site that was itself called a record in 2024, and +19.2% on the Sembawang Road parcel in the same planning area thirteen months earlier. The bid count is the sharper break: thirteen is the most since Sumang Walk drew seventeen in February 2018, and no EC site in between drew more than nine.
Three things remain open. The tender is provisional — HDB's own notice says a decision on the award "will be made after the bids have been evaluated," and as of writing Canberra Drive sits under provisional results, not final ones. The north has roughly 685 EC units arriving in the fourth quarter of 2026 from Woodlands Drive 17 and Sembawang Road, which ERA warned before the tender "may diffuse buyer interest." And the Admiralty Walk EC site closes on 17 December, with ERA forecasting $600–$700 and Huttons $530–$630. Wong Siew Ying called that tender "a second reading of how the market values EC land under the new measures." Given how the first reading went, the forecasts for it are the thing to watch rather than the result.
What to do with this
If you are waiting for an EC under the new rules, nothing in this tender says prices will be lower. It says developers paid a record for the right to find out, and the two analysts who put a number on it expect about $1,900 psf.
If you own an EC in the Canberra area, the land under the next one cost between 48% and 134% more per plot ratio foot than the land under yours. That is the argument for your resale price, and it is a stronger one than the launch price itself.
If you are reading that the cooling measures failed, that is premature in both directions. The measures were aimed at buyers' holding periods; the bids are developers' view of demand four years out. Neither has been tested by a launch yet.
Method
Tender facts — bidder names, bid amounts, site area, plot ratio, maximum and minimum gross floor area, height control and the provisional status of the award — are from HDB's own land tender results and its Additional Conditions of Tender for the parcel. Every psf per plot ratio figure in this article was computed from HDB's stated amount divided by its stated maximum gross floor area converted at 10.76391 square feet to the square metre, not taken from reporting; the winning rate reconciles to $825.00 exactly. Where HDB's bid amounts differ from press reporting — two of the thirteen do — HDB's figures are used. The historical EC land-rate and bid-count series is computed the same way from HDB's register of EC sites sold. The tender result, analyst commentary and launch-price forecasts were reported by EdgeProp Singapore, with Nicholas Mak's range and additional commentary via Stacked Homes. Pre-tender forecasts are from each agency's own release: ERA, and PropNex and Huttons as reported at the tender's launch. The 8 May 2026 rule changes and their application to sites with tender closing dates on or after that day are set out in PropNex's reproduction of the announcement. Canberra-area project prices are EdgeProp's trailing-twelve-month averages of recorded transactions. The $18,000 income ceiling from August 2026 and the Minister's quotation are media-reported; we did not locate the primary government release for either. The consortium behind the winning bid is named here as HDB names it — SNC3 Realty, HS Invesco and Kay Lim Realty; press reports attribute it to Santarli, Heeton, Kay Lim and Sunray, which we could not confirm against a corporate filing.
Check how your condo scores
2,357 condos independently scored across 7 weighted factors. No registration required.
Score my resale →Prefer a personal read on your situation? Arrange a consultation →Keep reading

2 October 2026Private Property Market
Freehold Is a Third of Singapore's New-Launch Projects and a Tenth of the Homes

1 October 2026Private Property Market
Four Analysts Priced the Same Siglap Plot. Their Forecasts Differ by $613,000 a Home.

1 October 2026Private Property Market
Private Prices Rose 1.4%. The 30% Volume Collapse in the Same Release Is a Partial Quarter.

TRIBE Editorial · Reviewed by Silas Tan
Co-Founder, TRIBE · District Director, Huttons Asia · Ex-Mortgage Banker (AVP) · >1,000 families advised · CEA R000303I
How TRIBE scores and checks its analysis
Spotted an error, or a figure that has moved since publication? Tell us and we will correct it.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice.