These Are Our Top 5 Condos in Bedok

Bedok doesn't make headlines. It has no Greater Southern Waterfront, no Punggol Digital District, no new-town glamour. What it has is data: of the 69 District 16 condos scored on the Resale Project Scorecard (RPS), 12 hold an S grade — a 17% hit rate against a Singapore-wide average of 9.2%. These are the five that score highest in Bedok proper.

How We Ranked This

The ranking is strictly by overall RPS score — no editorial adjustment. Each of the 2,369 resale condos in the RPS dataset (as of June 2026) is graded S to D on seven weighted factors: historical secondary-market performance against its same-era cohort (25%), primary school effect (20%), project size (16%), MRT proximity (13%), rental yield (10%), tenure (10%), and future transformation (6%).

One filter applied: District 16 is not Bedok. D16 also takes in Upper East Coast, Eastwood, Kew Drive and Bayshore. We screened all 69 D16 projects by actual location and kept only those in the Bedok planning area — Bedok Reservoir, Bedok Central, Bedok South and the Tanah Merah corridor. As it happens, the nine highest D16 scores all sit inside Bedok proper, so the filter removed candidates lower down the table, not at the top.

The Top 5 at a Glance

1. Grandeur Park Residences — 8.69

EL Development's 720-unit project at Bedok South Avenue 3 is the most balanced scorecard in the district: no factor below 7. The RPS summary calls it a "top-tier project across nearly every dimension," with project size (10/10) and schools (9/10) as standout strengths.

Two numbers do the heavy lifting. Rental yield of 4.56% — "exceptional income return" on the scorecard, scoring 9/10 — is rare for a 2020-vintage condo. And it sits 220m from Tanah Merah MRT (EW4) with, per the scorecard, "Sungei Bedok MRT (TE31/DT38, TEL5+DTL3e) at 0.29km... well positioned for the URA DMP2025 / LTA upcoming-MRT pipeline." That future transformation score of 7/10 is the highest among the five — most of Bedok scores 3.

Secondary-market performance is 8/10: average annualised appreciation of +3.62%, top-quartile within its 2020-era cohort. With roughly 89 years left on the lease, tenure decay isn't a near-term conversation.

2. Waterfront Key — 8.48

The first of three Bedok Reservoir entries. Keppel Land's 437-unit project posts a perfect 10 on secondary-market performance: average annualised appreciation of +3.55%, which the scorecard places "in the top 5% of its 2012-era cohort — exceptional capital appreciation relative to peers of the same vintage."

It also scores 10/10 on schools — three primary schools within 1km, nearest Yu Neng Primary at 0.38km — and 10/10 on MRT, sitting 190m from Bedok Reservoir station (DT30). That triple-ten is why it ranks second despite two genuine weaknesses the scorecard doesn't hide: rental yield of 2.97% ("below-average income return," 4/10) and future transformation of 3/10, with the nearest catalyst — Paya Lebar Air Base redevelopment — 1.6km away.

3. Waterfront Isle — 8.41

Sim Lian's 561 units land in what the scorecard calls the "ideal scale for liquidity and facilities without crowding" — a 10/10 size score. Schools also score 10/10 with four primaries within 1km, again anchored by Yu Neng.

Secondary performance is 9/10: +2.49% annualised, 82nd percentile of its 2015-era cohort. Yield of 3.26% is above average for the district (5/10), and the 0.44km walk to Bedok Reservoir MRT scores 8/10. Like its siblings, future transformation is the soft spot at 4/10.

4. Waterfront Waves — 8.35

The oldest of the Waterfront trio (TOP 2011) is also one of the strongest performers: +3.69% annualised, "top 6% of its 2011-era cohort" — a 10/10 secondary score. Schools score a perfect 10 as well, with Yu Neng Primary 0.40km away.

The trade-off mirrors Waterfront Key's: rental yield of 2.91% scores 4/10, and future transformation sits at 3/10. At 405 units it's the smallest project on this list, though still comfortably in liquid territory (8/10 size).

5. Bedok Residences — 8.14

CDL's integrated development above Bedok Mall is the convenience play: 120m from Bedok MRT (EW5) — a 10/10 — plus a 10/10 schools score with five primaries within 1km, and a 10/10 on size at 583 units.

What keeps it fifth rather than first is the price of that convenience. Secondary-market performance scores 7/10: +1.82% annualised, 69th percentile of its 2015-era cohort — solid, but the integrated-development premium paid at launch left less room for relative outperformance. Yield of 3.48% is above average (5/10), and future transformation is 3/10.

What the List Tells You

Bedok Reservoir is the spine. Three of the five — and numbers 7, 8 and 9 on the wider D16 table (Waterfront Gold at 7.98, Baywater at 7.97, The Clearwater at 7.83) — sit along the Bedok Reservoir corridor. The Downtown Line's arrival at Bedok Reservoir station (DT30) in 2017 repriced the whole stretch, and the cohort-relative data shows it: the Waterfront projects appreciated faster than almost everything else of their vintage.

Schools are Bedok's quiet edge. Four of the five score 9 or 10 on the primary-school factor, driven by Yu Neng, Red Swastika and Fengshan. School proximity weighted by ballot demand is 20% of the RPS score, and Bedok's mature catchment delivers it consistently.

Tanah Merah is where the forward-looking case lives. Grandeur Park Residences — and The Glades just behind it at 7.99 — are the only Bedok projects scoring 7/10 on future transformation, courtesy of the Thomson-East Coast Line extension and Sungei Bedok interchange. Central Bedok mostly scores 3: the estate is mature, and the catalysts are elsewhere.

The Honest Caveats

Everything here is 99-year leasehold. The Waterfront projects have roughly 80–82 years remaining; Bedok Residences about 84; Grandeur Park about 89. None is in decay territory, but a freehold buyer needs to look at D16's smaller boutique stock — and accept thinner liquidity.

Yield is mediocre on the Reservoir. Waterfront Key and Waterfront Waves both score 4/10 on rental yield (2.97% and 2.91%). If income return drives your purchase, Grandeur Park's 4.56% is the outlier worth noting.

Low future-transformation scores are a feature of maturity, not a defect — but they do mean central Bedok's case rests on what already exists, not on a pipeline. Buyers wanting a catalyst story should weight the Tanah Merah end.

The Bottom Line

Bedok's top five aren't speculative bets. They are mature, MRT-anchored, school-rich projects with a decade of cohort-relative outperformance behind them — which is exactly what the RPS is built to surface. The district's 17% S-grade rate, nearly double the national 9.2%, says the pattern is structural, not luck.

Check How Your Condo Scores

Every condo in this article is among the 2,369 independently scored across Singapore — each graded on seven weighted factors.

Score your resale condo on RPS →

No registration required. No agent call to follow. Just the data.

Silas Tan is a District Director at Huttons Asia and co-founder of TRIBE. He built the Resale Project Scorecard (RPS) using 126,000+ URA REALIS transactions. This article is for informational purposes and does not constitute financial or investment advice. CEA Registration R000303I.